Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Accuracy of prognosis estimates by four palliative care teams: a prospective cohort study

BMC Palliative Care20021:1

DOI: 10.1186/1472-684X-1-1

Received: 26 September 2001

Accepted: 04 March 2002

Published: 04 March 2002

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Sep 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Oct 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eduardo Bruera
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
19 Feb 2002 Author responded Author comments - Irene J Higginson
1 Mar 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eduardo Bruera
Resubmission - Version 6
19 Feb 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
4 Mar 2002 Editorially accepted
4 Mar 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-684X-1-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dept. Palliative Care and Policy, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre
(2)
Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trials, National Cancer Institute

Advertisement