Is it recorded in the notes? Documentation of end-of-life care and preferred place to die discussions in the final weeks of life
© Cox et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 19 August 2011
Accepted: 4 November 2011
Published: 4 November 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Cox|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Colleen Cartwright|
|14 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bridget Johnston|
|27 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Cox|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Cox|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|3 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|4 Nov 2011||Editorially accepted|
|4 Nov 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-684X-10-18|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.