Palliative care making a difference in rural Uganda, Kenya and Malawi: three rapid evaluation field studies
© Grant et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 7 September 2010
Accepted: 12 May 2011
Published: 12 May 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Sep 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne Merriman|
|8 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lukas Radbruch|
|13 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Faith Mwangi-Powell|
|17 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Harding|
|3 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Scott Murray|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne Merriman|
|7 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Harding|
|9 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Scott Murray|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Scott Murray|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 May 2011||Editorially accepted|
|12 May 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-684X-10-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.