Identifying bereaved subjects at risk of complicated grief: Predictive value of questionnaire items in a cohort study
© Guldin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 7 September 2010
Accepted: 16 May 2011
Published: 16 May 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Sep 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Boelen|
|29 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sheila Payne|
|11 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katherine Shear|
|15 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Papa|
|8 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Mai-Britt Guldin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Mai-Britt Guldin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|29 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Mai-Britt Guldin|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|29 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|16 May 2011||Editorially accepted|
|16 May 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-684X-10-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.