Under-diagnosis of pain by primary physicians and late referral to a palliative care team
© Akashi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 22 December 2011
Accepted: 7 June 2012
Published: 7 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Hui|
|2 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sriram Yennu|
|27 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maxine de la Cruz|
|26 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Masako Akashi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sriram Yennu|
|14 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Masako Akashi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|7 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-684X-11-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.