The uses of provincial administrative health databases for research on palliative care: Insights from British Columbia, Canada
© Allan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 22 July 2004
Accepted: 17 February 2005
Published: 17 February 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Jul 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Aug 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grace Johnston|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jan 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Diane Allan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Jan 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jan 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grace Johnston|
|11 Feb 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Diane Allan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Feb 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Feb 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Diane Allan|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|15 Feb 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|17 Feb 2005||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2005||Article published||10.1186/1472-684X-4-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.