Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics
© Simon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 09 October 2006
Accepted: 16 April 2007
Published: 16 April 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Oct 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Rietjens|
|20 Mar 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Alfred Simon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Mar 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Rietjens|
|1 Apr 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Alfred Simon|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Apr 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Apr 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Alfred Simon|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|12 Apr 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Apr 2007||Editorially accepted|
|16 Apr 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-684X-6-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.