Efficacy of a training intervention on the quality of practitioners' decision support for patients deciding about place of care at the end of life: A randomized control trial: Study protocol
© Murray et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 26 March 2008
Accepted: 30 April 2008
Published: 30 April 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Mar 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Apr 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Ann Murray|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|28 Apr 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|30 Apr 2008||Editorially accepted|
|30 Apr 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-684X-7-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.