A comparative analysis of computer based hospice palliative care datasets in Canada
© Kuziemsky and Lau; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 20 November 2007
Accepted: 12 May 2008
Published: 12 May 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Nov 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robin Fainsinger|
|15 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Irene J Higginson|
|21 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grace Johnston|
|25 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Craig Kuziemsky|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Apr 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Irene J Higginson|
|5 May 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Craig Kuziemsky|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 May 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 May 2008||Editorially accepted|
|12 May 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-684X-7-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.