From: Integrated palliative care in the Spanish context: a systematic review of the literature
First author, and Year | Disease | Design | Quality assessment according to Hawker et al. | Intervention | Outcome measurements | Results/effectiveness of intervention |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vicente et al., 2010. [12] | Malignant and Non-malignant Disease | Retrospective and prospective cohort study | 30 | Influence of the Integrated Plan of PCa of the Autonomous Community of Madrid in the medical activity of a hospital based PCa unit. | Improvement in continuity of care, coordination amongst assistant bodies, increase in mean stay at the PCUa, increase in number of home deaths, etc. | PC home care improves continuity in care of patients. Transfers to intermediate stay care centers from 112 (14,7 %) to 144 (21,5 %) (p = 0,001) and deaths at home increased from 61 (8 %) to 97 (14,5 %) (p = 0,000). Median stay at the PCU a decreased from 7 to 6 days (p = 0,155). |
Navarro et al., 2011.[11] | Advanced Chronic Disease | Observational, retrospective and descriptive study | 26 | EoLCa of advanced chronic non-cancer patients identified by multidimensional evaluation and interdisciplinary teamwork in a medium and long term hospital. | General data, terminal criteria, diagnostic and prognostic information, development of advance directives, limiting levels of effort care, times from admission, risk of complicated bereavement. | Identification of advanced chronic non-cancer patients and their needs by interdisciplinary teamwork enabled indication for PC soon after admission (median 7Â days, 15Â days pure palliative treatment) and ensured appropriate care during their stay (prognostic to the family, increased from 65Â % to 92Â %; advance directives from 25Â % to 96Â %; adequacy level of care effort increased; Zarit score decreased, and risk of a complicated bereavement, 5Â %. |