Palliative sedation challenging the professional competency of health care providers and staff: a qualitative focus group and personal written narrative study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 July 2016
Accepted: 4 April 2017
Published: 11 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Pype|
|18 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kay De Vries|
|5 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Daniele Leboul|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Pype|
|23 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kay De Vries|
|7 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Daniele Leboul|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12904-017-0198-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.