Improving hospital-based end of life care processes and outcomes: a systematic review of research output, quality and effectiveness
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 October 2016
Accepted: 26 April 2017
Published: 19 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Downing|
|6 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pablo Hernández-Marrero|
|12 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steffen T Simon|
|26 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Amy Waller|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Amy Waller|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12904-017-0204-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.