Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What "best practice" could be in Palliative Care: an analysis of statements on practice and ethics expressed by the main Health Organizations

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Mar 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Guido Miccinesi
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Kehl
12 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Salimah Meghani
10 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Guido Miccinesi
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Guido Miccinesi
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Guido Miccinesi
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Guido Miccinesi
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
7 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
7 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-684X-9-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement