This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Developing research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe: a consultation process using nominal group technique
© Tuffrey-Wijne et al. 2016
Received: 25 June 2015
Accepted: 17 March 2016
Published: 24 March 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Jun 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Aug 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iwao Osaka|
|27 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gloria Krahn|
|16 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Irene Tuffrey-Wijne|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gloria Krahn|
|24 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Irene Tuffrey-Wijne|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|24 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12904-016-0108-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.