Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Improving palliative care in selected settings in England using quality indicators: a realist evaluation

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arif Kamal
15 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Parker
20 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Steve Iliffe
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Parker
26 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Steve Iliffe
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Parker
31 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Steve Iliffe
Resubmission - Version 4
31 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Steve Iliffe
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Jul 2016 Editorially accepted
2 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12904-016-0144-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement