Skip to main content

Table 3 Cross-over trials

From: Benefits of interventions for respiratory secretion management in adult palliative care patients—a systematic review

Population/PEDro Scale

Interventions

Outcomes

Senent et al (2011) [23]

Neuromuscular diseases (n = 16)

3

Coached unassisted cough

No improvements

Couched unassisted cough + abdominal thrust

No improvements

Abdominal thrust + Air Stacking

Improvements: PCF:284(146–353)L/min, ↑238 % than baseline 84(35–118)L/min (statistically higher than first two methods)

Abdominal thrust + usual patient’s bi-level ventilator

Improvements: PCF:212(99–595)L/min, ↑152 % than baseline (statistically higher than first two methods)/Comfort (VAS): 8(7–8)pts,↑60 % than baseline 5(4–7)pts (statistically higher than all other methods).

Abdominal thrust + IPAP of +30cmH2O

Improvements: PCF: 233(100–389)L/min, ↑177 % than baseline (statistically higher than first two methods).

MIE (40cmH2O)

Improvements: PCF: 488(243–605)L/min (↑480 %) than baseline/Effectiveness (VAS): 8(6–8)pts ↑100 % than baseline 4(2–7)pts (statistically higher than all other methods).

  

NMD (n = 7)

ALS (n = 13)

COPD (n = 9)

Winck et al (2004) [24]

Neuromuscular Disease and COPD (n = 29)

3

MIE (15cmH2O)

No Improvements

No Improvements

No Improvements

MIE (30cmH2O)

No Improvements

No Improvements

No Improvements

MIE (40cmH2O)

Improvements: PCF: 220(190–300)L/min, ↑22 % than baseline 180(150–275)L/min/SpO2: 94(92–96), than 98(97–98), ↑4 %/Dyspnoea (BORG) 0.75(0–2.3)pts, ↓62 % than baseline 2(0.4–3.3)pts.

Improvements:PCF:200(170–352)L/min ↑17 % than baseline 170(128–300)L/min/SpO2: 98(97–98)%,↑4 % than baseline 94(94–95)%

Improvements: SpO2: 97(95–97)%, ↑5 %/ than baseline 92(91–94)%, Dyspnoea (BORG) 1(1–2.5)pts, ↓200 % than baseline 3(2–4)pts.

Bach (1993) [25]

Neuromuscular diseases (n = 21)

4

Air Stacking

Improvements: PCF: 3.37 ± 1.07 L/s, ↑86 % than baseline 1.81 ± 1.03 L/s

Manually Assisted Cough

Improvements: PCF: 4.27 ± 1.29 L/s, ↑135 % than baseline

MIE (Individualized pressure)

Improvements PCF: 7.47 ± 1.02 L/s, ↑312 % than baseline (higher than all other methods)/FVC: 0.54 ± 0.39 L, ↑10 % than baseline 0.49 ± 0.37 L/FEF25-75 %: 0.91 ± 0.69 L/s, ↑13 % than baseline 0.80 ± 0.59 L/s

Sancho et al (2003) [26]

ALS (n = 6)

5

Tracheal Suctioning

Improvements: WB: 0.95 ± 0.23 J/L, ↓7 % than baseline 1.03 ± 0.25 J/L

Worsening: All patients referred as less comfortable and effective than MIE

MIE (40cmH2O)

Improvements: SpO2:,↑3 % than baseline 93.5 ± 2.25 %/Peak Inspiratory Pressure: 15.33 ± 4.13cmH2O, ↓17 % than baseline 18.5 ± 4.23cmH2O/Mean Airway Pressure: 3.83 ± 1.72cmH2O, ↓8 % than baseline 4.67 ± 1.37cmH2O/WB: 0.87 ± 0.26, ↓15 % than baseline

Population/PEDro Scale

Interventions

Outcomes

Chatwin, et al (2009) [27]

Neuromuscular diseases (n = 8)

4

Chest Physiotherapy + MIE

Improvements: ↓ Duration of the intervention (17 min shorter than only Physiotherapy)

Chatwin et al (2003) [28]

Neuromuscular Diseases (n = 14)

3

Standard Physiotherapy Assisted Cough

No improvements

Cough + Non-Invasive Ventilation

No improvements

Exsufflation Assisted Cough

Improvements: PCF ↑a

MIE

Improvements: PCF ↑a

Lacombe, et al (2014) [29]

Neuromuscular Disease (n = 18)

5

MIE (highest tolerable pressure)

Improvements: PCF ↑ a than baseline; Effective Cough Time ↑a compared to baseline

MAC + IPAP

Improvements: Effectiveness: 8.3(7.2–9)pts, ↑29.6 % than MIE 6.4(4.8–8.2)pts; PCF ↑a; Effective Cough Time ↑ a (all compared to MIE)

MAC + MIE (highest tolerable pressure)

Improvements: Effectiveness: 8.5(6.2–9)pts, ↑32.8 % higher than MIE; PCF ↑a; Effective Cough Time↑a (all compared to MIE)

Linder (1993) [30]

Patients with quadriplegia (n = 8)

5

Cough with FES

Improvements: PEMax: 60 ± 22.8cmH2O, ↑119,7 % than baseline 27.3 ± 6.4cmH2O

MAC

Improvements: PEMax: 83 ± 18.7cmH2O, ↑ 38.3 % than Cough with FES

Toussaint et al (2003) [31]

Duchenne dystrophy patients (n = 8)

4

Cough assistance techniques

No improvements

Percussive Ventilation + cough assistance techniques

Improvements: Removed secretion: 6.53. ± 4.77 g,↑42.8 % than Cough assisted techniques 4.57 ± 3.5 g; (Only in a sub-group of five hypersecretive patients)

O’Connell, et al (2011) [32]

Cystic Fibrosis (n = 4)

4

Hypertonic Saline using Jet Nebulizer

No improvements

Hypertonic Saline using PEP mask

Improvements: Subjective report of chest tightness 1.7pts, ↓68 % than without PEP mask 5.3pts

  1. Values presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). Insufflation-Exsufflation; MAC Manually assisted cough, NMD Neuromuscular Disease, ALS Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SpO 2 Peripheral oxygen saturation, FVC Forced vital capacity, FEF25–75 % Mean forced expiratory flow at 25–75 % expiratory period, WB Work of breath, FES Functional electrical stimulation, PEMax Maximum expiratory pressure, PEP Positive expiratory pressure. aResults presented graphically in the original paper