|
Hakanson et al., (2015) [6]
|
Providing Palliative Care in a Swedish Support Home for People Who Are Homeless
|
4
|
3 – literature review good but no objectives
|
4 – good description of data collection and recording methods
|
2/3 – no justification of sampling size but reports that all staff at the hostel were invited…?
|
4
|
4 – good description of ethical considerations. Researchers role reflected upon in design section
|
4 – finding relate to aims and are supported by quotes
|
4 – the context and setting of the research are well described
|
4 – insights from Sweden, ideas for research – perspectives of participants, practice – apply interventions based on this research to other pall care settings for HP
| |
33/34
|
|
Ko & Nelson-Becker (2014) [33]
|
Does end-of-life decision making matter? Perspectives of older homeless adults
|
4
|
2/3 – no objectives. Literature review brief
|
3 – brief but includes some of the Qs asked.
|
2/3 recruitment no justification of sample size.
|
4
|
2 – insufficient detail for full assessment to be made
|
4 – clear & relate to aims, supported by quotes
|
3 – setting more needed to replicate
|
4 – insights of older HP, research – mixed site, practice – recommendations for discussing EoL
| |
28/30
|
|
Ko, Kwak & Nelson-Becker (2015) [32]
|
What Constitutes a Good and Bad Death?: Perspectives of Homeless Older Adults
|
4
|
3 – no objectives, good lit review
|
3 – Brief but includes some of the Qs asked.
|
2/3 recruitment & participant characteristics described, no justification of sample size.
|
4
|
2 – insufficient detail for full assessment to be made
|
4
|
2 setting- more needed to replicate
|
4 – themes relating to good death for older HP – research – include HP from multiple sites – practice – HCP need better understanding of HP and EoL
|
Same participants as previous study
|
28/29
|
