Clinical decision making in the recognition of dying: a qualitative interview study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Bloomer|
|7 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gregory Crawford|
|2 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Taylor|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Bloomer|
|26 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Taylor|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12904-016-0179-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.