Table 2 Quality assessment of included studies
Title & abstract | Introduction & aims | Method & data | Sampling | Data analysis | Ethics & bias | Results | Transferability & generalizability | Implications & usefulness | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morita T, 2002 [37] | ++ | + | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | Data analysis: low response rate, missing data not explained, no information about overall burnout score |
Morita T, 2004 [38] | + | + | + | ++ | - | + | + | + | ++ | Validity of endpoints: Single item endpoint; no explanation for cut-off value differentiation low and high-level burden Confounding: Stressors others than CDS influencing nurses burden |
Rietjens JAC, 2007 [39] | + | + | - | - | ++ | ++ | + | - | ++ | Recall bias: Memorable case up to 5 years in the past Generalizability: Context information insufficient, no information how context relates to findings; no reference for interview guide; no information about data saturation |