Skip to main content

Table 4 Study effects within and between treatment groups

From: When a parent dies – a systematic review of the effects of support programs for parentally bereaved children and their caregivers

Interventions directed to the bereaved children

Intervention

Reference and grade of evidence

Study population

Evaluation design

Measure

Outcome variable

Effect size TG

Effect size CG

Effect size between groups

sig

dz

CL %

sig

dz

CL %

sig

dm (ϕ)

“Bereavement groups for inner-city children”

Schilling et al. 1992 [36]

38 children (age 6–12)

Pre-test/post-test-design

BID

Depr. (Parent)

Depr. (Child)

.26

.29

−.22

.21

−59

58

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

IIIC

 

Evaluation: post treatment

ATCD

Attitudes and Concepts of Death

.01

.52

70

na

na

na

na

na

Grief camp “Camp MAGIC” (CG) delayed treatment

McClatchey et al. 2009 [31]

100 children (age 6–16)

Quasi experimental design

UCLA PTSD

PTSD-symptoms

.08

.33

63

.73

−.05

52

.08

.27

IIB

TG = 46 CG = 54

Evaluation: post treatment

EGI

Childhood Traumatic Grief

.00

.73

77

.90

−.02

51

.01

.50

“Writing for recovery” (CG) no treatment

Kalantari et al. 2012 [28]

IB

61 children (age 12–18)

TG = 29 CG = 32

RCT

Evaluation: 1 week post treatment

TGIC

Traumatic grief

.00

1.26

90

.03

−.39

65

.00

1.21

Family-intervention (CG) no treatment

Black & Urbanowicz 1985 [40]; 1987 [25]

IIB

83 children (age 0–16)

TG = 38 CG = 45

45 families

TG = 21 CG = 24

RCT

Evaluation: 1 year post treatment

Clinical Interview

Behavior

Sleep

Depressed parent

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

.05

.09

.01

(.21)

(.21)

(.33)

Talk about dead parent

na

na

na

na

na

na

.04

(.26)

Rutter A

Rutter A

Restless

Nail-biting

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

.01

.03

(.34)

(.28)

School problems

na

na

na

na

na

na

.10

(.19)

Family-intervention (CG) no treatment

Black & Urbanowicz 1987 [25]

IIB

73 children (age 0–16)

TG = 38 CG = 35

39 families

TG = 21 CG = 18

RCT

Evaluation: 2 years post treatment

Clinical Interview

Behavior

Talk dead parent

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

.09

.04

(.28)

(.24)

School

Health

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

.03

.04

(.28)

(.39)

“Parent Guidance Program” (CG) telephone monitoring intervention

Christ et al. 2005 [26]

IA

104 families with children (age 7–17)

TG = 79 CG = 25

RCT

Evaluation: 8 and 14 months after parent’s death

CDI

SEI

STAI-S

STAI-T

CBCL-soc

Depression

Self-Esteem

State anxiety

Trait anxiety

Social competence

.00

.00

.00

.00

.29

.56

.64

.89

.61

.17

71

74

81

73

57

.03

.21

.12

.87

.27

.48

.29

.35

.04

−.31

69

61

64

51

62

.53

.36

.12

.31

.32

.14

.28

.44

.43

.36

CBCL-bprob

Behavior problem

.17

.16

59

.80

−.07

53

.69

.26

POPM-tot

Perceived

Parenting

.06

.25

60

.31

−.22

59

.11

.37

“The Family Bereavement Program” (first version) (CG) delayed treatment

Sandler et al. 1992 [32]

IB

72 families with 72 children (age 7–17)

TG = 35 CG = 37

RCT

Evaluation: post treatment

CRPBI

PRS

PRS

Par. warmth

Grief discussion

Par. Support

.00

.78

.00

.97

.07

.88

83

53

81

.25

.00

.11

.22

−.70

−.31

59

76

62

.03

.03

.01

.50

.62

.83

“The Family Bereavement Program” (revised version) (CG) self-study program

Sandler et al. 2003 [33]

IA

156 families

TG = 90 CG = 66

244 children (age 8–16)

TG = 135 CG = 109

RCT

Evaluation: Posttest and 11 months post treatment

Posttest

 

Comp.

GLESC

Comp.

Comp.

AIS

TAS

SPPC

MCPCS

CBCL

CBCL

Pos. parenting

Negative events

Ment. health

Positive coping

Inhibition

Neg. thoughts

Self-esteem

Control belieifs

Internalizing

Externalizing

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

.00

.03

.01

.02

.01

.78

.37

.72

.03

.11

.58a

.43a

.50a

.30a

.48a

.05a

.19a

.06a

.41a

.28a

11-mth

 

Comp.

GLESC

Comp.

Comp.

AIS

TAS

SPPC

MCPCS

CBCL

CBCL

Pos. parenting

Negative events

Ment.health

Positive coping

Inhibition

Neg. thoughts

Self-esteem

Control belieifs

Internalizing

Externalizing

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

.03

.11

.10

.20

.06

.18

.16

.00

.61

.19

.39a

.32a

.32a

.18a

.39a

.29a

.27a

.40a

.10a

.24a

“The Family Bereavement Program” (CG) self-study program

Schmiege et al. 2006 [37]

IA

156 families

TG = 90 CG = 66

244 children (age 8–16)

TG = 135 CG = 109

RCT

Evaluation: 3 and 11 months post treatment

 

3-months

 

CMAS-R

Anxiety Girls

Anxiety Boys

.08a

.17a

.32a

.23a

59

57

.32a

.04a

.20a

.38a

56

61

.41c

.25c

.11

−.13

CDI

Depression Girls

Depression Boys

.10a

.19a

.30a

.22a

58

56

.28a

.37a

.21a

.17a

56

55

.58c

.98c

.11

.06

YSR

Externaliz. Girls

Externaliz. Boys

.03a

.08a

.39a

.30a

61

58

.09a

.05a

.34a

.38a

59

61

.36c

.50c

.08

−.03

CBCL

Intrenaliz. Girls

Internaliz. Boys

.00a

.00a

.74a

.48a

70

63

.01a

.00a

.53a

.69a

65

69

.88c

.39c

.19

−.16

CBCL

Externaliz. Girls

Externaliz. Boys

.00a

.01a

.56a

.43a

65

62

.07a

.00a

.37a

.57a

60

66

.43c

.44c

.23

−.12

 

11-months

 

CMAS-R

Anxiety Girls

Anxiety Boys

.02a

.01a

.43a

.44a

62

62

.80a

.01a

.05a

.48a

51

63

.06c

.73c

.36

.02

CDI

Depression Girls

Depression Boys

.02a

.07a

.41a

.32a

62

59

.55a

.05a

.12a

.37

53

60

.16c

.65c

.28

−.01

YSR

Externaliz. Girls

Externaliz. Boys

.08a

.27a

.33a

.19a

59

55

.89a

.13a

-.03a

.30a

51

58

.03c

.45c

.36

−.08

CBCL

Intrenaliz. Girls

Internaliz. Boys

.00a

.01a

.80a

.47a

72

63

.01a

.00a

.57a

.63a

66

67

.93c

.58c

.20

−.10

CBCL

Externaliz. Girls

Externaliz. Boys

.00a

.02a

.55a

.42a

65

62

.32a

.00a

.20a

.69a

56

69

.11c

.86c

.40

−.22

“The Family Bereavement Program” (CG) self-study program

Luecken et al. 2010 [29]

IA

139 children

TG = 78 CG = 61 (age 8–16)

RCT

Evaluation: 6 years post treatment

Cortisol

Cortisol level before and after a conflict discussion task

na

na

na

na

na

na

.03b

.39b

“The Family Bereavement Program” (CG) self-study program

Sandler et al. 2010 [34]

IA

156 families

TG = 90 CG = 66

RCT

Evaluation: Post-test, 11 months and 6 years post treatment

 

Post (3-months)

 

TRIG

IGTS

Present grief

Intrusive grief

.19a

.16a

-.16a

.17a

54

55

.09a

.50a

-.23a

.09a

57

53

.72c

.43c

.05

.09

244 children (age 8–16)

TG = 135 CG = 109

 

11-months

 

TRIG

IGTS

Present grief

Intrusive grief

.69a

.00a

.05a

.47a

51

63

.87a

.12a

-.02a

.21a

51

56

.88c

.06c

.08

.27

 

6-years

 

TRIG

IGTS

Present grief

Intrusive grief

.00a

.00a

.73a

1.30a

70

82

.00a

.00a

.63a

1.08a

67

78

.75c

.03c

.14

.21

“The Family Bereavement Program” (CG) self-study program

Sandler et al. 2010 [35]

IA

140 families

TG = 78 CG = 62

RCT

Evaluation: 6 years post treatment

DISC Compsite

Mental Disorder

Externalizing

Internalizing

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

.28b

.02b

.57b

nab

.31b

nab

218 children

TG = 116 CG = 102

RSE

PERI

BDI

Self-esteem

Demoralization

Depression

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

na

.01b

.03b

.04b

.40b

.42b

.40b

  1. Note: TG = Treatment Group; CG = Control Group. Effect size is presented in Cohen’s d and Common Language effect size (CL). The CL effect size indicates that after controlling for individual differences, the likelihood in percent that a person scores a different observed measurement for Mean 1 than for Mean 2. For categorical data ϕ is presented. Numerical data in the publications have been used or recalculated when possible, na = not available, e.g. numbers are missing or calculating not possible based on information in the publication
  2. Abbreviations: AIS active inhibition scale, BID bellevue index of depression, CAS child assessment schedule, CBCL child behavior checklist, CDI children’s depression inventory, CMAS-R children’s manifest anxiety scale-revised, Comp composite scale, CRPBI children’s reports of parental behavior inventory, DISC the diagnostic interview schedule for children, EGI the extended grief inventory, GLESC general life events schedule for children, IGTS intrusive grief thoughts scale, MCPCS multidimensional measure of children’s perceptions of control scale, PERI psychiatric epidemiology research interview, POPM perception of parenting measure, PRS parent report scale, RSE Rosenberg self-esteem scale, SEI self-esteem inventory – short form, SPPC self perception profile for children, STAIC state-trait anxiety inventory for children, STAIY state-trait anxiety inventory for youth, TAS threat appraisal scale, TGIC traumatic grief inventory for children, TRIG Texas Revised Inventory of Grief (Present), UCLA PTSD University of California–Los Angeles Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for the DSM-IV for Children
  3. aDue to data presented in article calculated as independent t-test, effect size ds
  4. bCohen’s d and p-value as reported by the authors of the study in reference. Only findings with p ≤ .05 were reported
  5. cDue to data presented in article calculated as independent t-test at each time-point (post, follow-up respectively), when controlled for no statistical significant difference in pre-rating