Skip to main content

Table 2 Reasons Given for Decision to Commence Antibiotics or Not. Responses by State % (n)

From: Comparing doctors’ legal compliance across three Australian states for decisions whether to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment: does different law lead to different decisions?

Reasons for commencing antibiotics (not following advance directive)

NSW

% (n)

QLD

% (n)

VIC

% (n)

I do not have to follow the advance directive because it is inconsistent with what is clinically indicated

13 (31)

14 (21)

11 (21)

The advance directive is relevant to my decision-making process but other factors are more relevant

70 (164)

70 (108)

73 (124)

The advance directive is not relevant to my decision-making because I don’t believe advance directives are appropriate to determining treatment

2 (4)

1(1)

1 (1)

The advance directive does not have legal effect

3 (8)

3(5)

6 (12)

Other

10 (24)

10 (17)

8 (16)

Total

100 (231)

100 (152)

100 (192)

Reasons for not commencing antibiotics (following advance directive)

NSW

% (n)

QLD

% (n)

VIC

% (n)

The most important consideration is following the patient’s wishes

43 (40)

33 (20)

30 (34)

The most important consideration is that the law requires me to follow the advance directive

8 (7)

10 (6)

4 (5)

Both of the above considerations are equally important

48 (45)

57 (34)

64 (73)

Other

0

0

2 (2)

Total

100 (92)

100 (60)

100 (114)