Skip to main content

Table 6 Attitudes Toward Death by Socio-Demographic Characteristics a

From: The contribution of a MOOC to community discussions around death and dying

 

Health Occupation b

University Qualified b

Gender b

Age c

SEIFA Disadvantage c

 

Z (n)

Z (n)

Z (n)

r (n)

r (n)

Pre-MOOC Death Attitudes

 Death is a normal part of life

0.44 (1154)

4.09*** (1154)

−1.05 (1140)

.05 (1148)

.02 (1078)

 I am comfortable talking about death/dying

−1.38 (1154)

1.23 (1154)

−0.97 (1140)

.14*** (1148)

.01 (1078)

 Most people do NOT feel comfortable talking about death/dying

1.75 (1154)

2.73** (1154)

−0.28 (1140)

.03 (1148)

.03 (1078)

 Death/dying is presented as a normal part of life in the mainstream media

−0.17 (1154)

−7.55*** (1154)

0.73 (1140)

−.05 (1148)

−.14*** (1078)

 Social media provides different perspectives to mainstream media on death/dying

0.64 (928)

−0.73 (928)

1.13 (915)

−.03 (922)

−.04 (877)

Post-MOOC Death Attitudes

 Death is a normal part of life

0.45 (208)

−0.22 (208)

−0.38 (206)

.09 (205)

−.06 (200)

 I am comfortable talking about death/dying

−0.75 (208)

−1.35 (208)

−1.75 (206)

.18** (205)

−.19**(200)

 Most people do NOT feel comfortable talking about death/dying

−0.78 (208)

0.61 (208)

−0.05 (206)

.21** (205)

.14 (200)

 Death/dying is presented as a normal part of life in the mainstream media

1.39 (208)

−4.38*** (208)

0.82 (206)

−.02 (205)

−.13 (200)

 Social media provides different perspectives to mainstream media on death/dying

−0.53 (208)

−3.25*** (208)

0.72 (206)

.06 (205)

−.09 (200)

  1. aPre-MOOC death attitudes data was provided by n = 1154, with the exception of the social media question, which was only presented to n = 928. N = 208 participants had socio-demographic data at enrolment and death attitudes data at the conclusion of the MOOC. A small number of participants had missing data on gender and age. SEIFA Disadvantage Index is only available for n = 1078 participants who provided an Australian postcode for their location at enrolment
  2. bThe non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyse group differences due to the ordinal nature of the death attitude questions, and their skewed distributions. Nonetheless, the conclusions from the Independent samples t-tests and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests were the same
  3. cSpearman’s Rank-Order Correlation was used to analyse associations due to the ordinal nature of the death attitude questions. Conclusions using Pearson’s correlations were very similar
  4. Note. ** p < .01; *** p < .001