Using motivational interviewing to facilitate death talk in end-of-life care: an ethical analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Nov 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tavis Campbell|
|21 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Vallis|
|19 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Isra Black|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Vallis|
|26 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tavis Campbell|
|2 Mar 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Isra Black|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Mar 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Mar 2018||Editorially accepted|
|21 Mar 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12904-018-0305-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.