Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of initial observations and user experiences during the application of PALETTE

From: Introducing PALETTE: an iterative method for conducting a literature search for a review in palliative care

Topic

Experience LR1

Experience LR2

Developing the review question: Initial review question

‘What are experienced barriers in practicing Paediatric Palliative Care from the perspective of professional caregivers?’

‘How do patients experience and respond to ACP in palliative care?’

Developing the review question: experts

Approached: 0 experts.

Approached: 33 experts.

Result: 6 potentially relevant studies of which none became a ‘golden bullet’.

Developing the review question/validation: ‘golden bullets’

33 ‘golden bullets’ were identified

7 ‘golden bullets’ were identified.

Developing the review question: Adjusted review question

What barriers and facilitators in providing Paediatric Palliative Care are experienced by healthcare professionals?’

Not applicable

Developing the review question: PICO/keywords

‘Barrier’, ‘facilitator’ and, ‘need’ were removed from the search strategy.

The method of data collection was added to the search strategy.

Final review question

‘What are the experiences of healthcare professionals when providing Paediatric Palliative Care?

’What are the experiences with ACP of patients with a life threatening or life-limiting illness?’

Performing the search: number to screen

Traditional search (Medline):

• 2815 articles

• 31 relevant articles

PALETTE

(Medline):

• 2600 articles

• 42 relevant articles

Traditional search I (Medline):

• 14,746 articles

• 20 relevant articles

Traditional search II (Medline):

• 5153 articles

• 14 relevant articles

PALETTE

(Medline):

• 3555 articles

• 20 relevant articles

  1. ACP Advance Care Planning, LR1 Literature Review 1, LR2 Literature Review 2