Skip to main content

Table 2 Assessment of study quality

From: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of palliative care for pain among Chinese adults with cancer

Studies

Quality Indicators from the modified Jadad scale

Total score

A

B

C

D

E

Li, 2006 [30]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Huang, 2010 [28]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Xu, 2014 [35]

1

1

0

0

0

2

Kang, 2015 [29]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Wu, 2015 [33]

1

0

0

1

0

2

Liu, 2016 [31]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Su, 2016 [25]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Fei, 2016 [24]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Wu, 2017 [34]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Luo, 2017 [32]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Gao, 2017 [26]

1

1

0

1

0

3

He, 2017 [27]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Yao, 2017 [36]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Zhang, 2018 [37]

1

1

0

1

1

4

You, 2018 [38]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Rao, 2018 [39]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Cao, 2018 [40]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Yang, 2019 [41]

1

0

0

0

1

2

  1. Abbreviations: A represents “Was the study described as randomized?” (1: Yes; 0: No); B represents “Was the method of randomization appropriate?” (1: Yes; 0: Not described; −1: No); C represents “Was there a description of withdrawals and dropouts?” (1: Yes; 0: No); D represents “Was there a clear description of the inclusion/exclusion criteria?” (1: Yes; 0: No); E represents “Was the methods of statistical analysis described?” (1: Yes; 0: No)