Table 3 LCA results: Model fit, class size and profiles in 2-class solution
LL | BIC (LL) | L2 | df | No. of parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-Class | − 1210.1 | 2474.7 | 854.5 | 221 | 10 | |
2-Class | − 1079.7 | 2273.8 | 593.6 | 210 | 21 | |
3-Class | − 1073.0 | 2320.1 | 580.1 | 199 | 32 | |
4-Class | − 1068.1 | 2370.1 | 570.3 | 188 | 43 | |
5-Class | − 1064.4 | 2422.7 | 563.0 | 177 | 54 | |
Class 1 | Class 2 | |||||
Size (%) | 68.3 | 31.7 | ||||
Indicators (# words) | ||||||
Harm-Virtue (Wald = 67, p < 0.00) | 0.25 | 0.99 | ||||
Harm-Vice (Wald = 33, p < 0.00) | 0.20 | 0.90 | ||||
Fairness-Virtue (Wald = 42, p < 0.00) | 0.06 | 0.57 | ||||
Fairness-Vice (Wald = 0.3, p < 0.62) | 0.01 | 0.03 | ||||
Ingroup-Virtue (Wald = 56, p < 0.00) | 0.23 | 1.17 | ||||
Ingroup-Vice (Wald = 19, p < 0.00) | 0.00 | 0.06 | ||||
Authority-Virtue (Wald = 71, p < 0.00) | 0.14 | 1.27 | ||||
Authority-Vice (Wald = 4, p = 0.04) | 0.00 | 0.02 | ||||
Purity-Virtue (Wald = 24, p < 0.00) | 0.01 | 0.43 | ||||
Purity-Vice (Wald = 8, p = 0.01) | 0.01 | 0.10 | ||||
Covariates | ||||||
Gender (%) | ||||||
Male | 52 | 48 | ||||
Female | 48 | 52 | ||||
Age (%) (Wald = 15, p < 0.00) | ||||||
< 22 | 20 | 17 | ||||
23–30 | 21 | 18 | ||||
31–39 | 22 | 21 | ||||
40–45 | 20 | 18 | ||||
46–61 | 17 | 26 | ||||
Race and Ethnicity (%) (Wald = 8, p < 0.00) | ||||||
Black or Hispanic | 20 | 25 | ||||
White | 80 | 75 | ||||
Education (%) (Wald = 4, p = 0.04) | ||||||
Did not graduate high school | 18 | 11 | ||||
High school graduate or GED | 33 | 19 | ||||
Associate Degree / Technical School | 24 | 31 | ||||
Bachelor’s Degree | 12 | 15 | ||||
Masters or Doctorate Degree | 13 | 24 | ||||
Financial Security (%) (Wald = 1, p = 0.23) | ||||||
None of the time | 8 | 8 | ||||
Some of the time | 25 | 28 | ||||
Most of the time | 29 | 27 | ||||
All of the time | 38 | 37 | ||||
Spiritual Needs supported (%) (Wald = 3, p = 0.08) | ||||||
Completely | 22 | 19 | ||||
Quite a bit | 18 | 23 | ||||
Moderately | 17 | 21 | ||||
Slightly | 9 | 8 | ||||
Not at all | 28 | 26 | ||||
Missing | 6 | 2 | ||||
Emotional Distress (%) (Wald = 0.4, p = 0.51) | ||||||
Completely | 17 | 17 | ||||
Quite a bit | 22 | 19 | ||||
Moderately | 12 | 20 | ||||
Slightly | 21 | 26 | ||||
Not at all | 22 | 17 | ||||
missing | 6 | 1 | ||||
EOL preference focus comfort-directed treatment (%) (Wald = 0.4, p = 0.55) | ||||||
Strongly disagree | 8 | 4 | ||||
Disagree | 3 | 2 | ||||
Not sure | 23 | 18 | ||||
Agree | 12 | 19 | ||||
Strongly agree | 50 | 56 | ||||
missing | 4 | 1 | ||||
Total words used (excluding stop words) (%) (Wald = 22, p < 0.00) | ||||||
< 32 | 29 | 0 | ||||
33–73 | 29 | 0 | ||||
74–110 | 28 | 3 | ||||
111–151 | 13 | 36 | ||||
152–197 | 1 | 61 | ||||
Christian (%) (Wald = 8, p = 0.01) | ||||||
0 | 32 | 28 | ||||
1 | 68 | 72 | ||||
Other religion (%) (Wald = 7, p = 0.01) | ||||||
0 | 93 | 86 | ||||
1 | 6 | 14 | ||||