Skip to main content

Table 2 Qualitative coding framework, themes, and quantitative results

From: How well do documented goals-of-care discussions for patients with stage IV cancer reflect communication best practices?

THEME

n(%)

Total

N = 206

Documented in ACP Note

N = 84

Not Documented in ACP Note

N = 122

p-value

Section 1: Documentation of Prognosis & Disease Stage Understanding

 Assess illness understanding

183 (89)

76 (90)

107 (88)

0.54

 Life expectancy

46 (22)

19 (23)

27 (22)

0.93

 What will happen in the future

21 (10)

7 (8)

14 (11)

0.47

Section 2: Documentation of Decision Alternatives, including Broad Goals of Care & Treatment Options

 Explore goals and values

171 (83)

76 (90)

95 (78)

0.02*

  Broad goals of care (includes longevity, function, comfort) & QoL

141 (68)

67 (80)

74 (61)

< 0.01*

  Personal Goals (e.g., family, location/home, events)

87 (42)

36 (43)

51 (42)

0.88

  Tradeoffs (including risks/benefits)

58 (28)

20 (24)

38 (31)

0.25

 Explore patient treatment preferences

201 (98)

81 (96)

120 (98)

0.38

  Hospice

128 (62)

52 (62)

76 (62)

0.96

  Cancer treatment

127 (62)

48 (57)

79 (65)

0.27

  Code status

105 (51)

64 (76)

41 (34)

< 0.01*

  ICU/life support/machines

79 (38)

37 (44)

42 (34)

0.16

  Surrogate decision making

10 (5)

7 (8)

3 (2)

0.05

 Discuss uncertainty (medical)

8 (4)

3 (4)

5 (4)

0.85

 Make recommendations/treatment no longer an option

82 (40)

34 (40)

4 (39)

0.87

 Address emotional/spiritual needs

31 (15)

6 (7)

27 (22)

< 0.01*

Section 3: Documentation of Decision Making

 Document a clear decision/plan

170 (83)

70 (83)

100 (82)

0.80

 Document ongoing decision making process

46 (22)

24 (29)

22 (18)

0.07

 Provide information about options with unclear next steps; no documentation of shared decision making

8 (4)

2 (2)

6 (5)

0.36