Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences in characteristics between physicians with an opinion in favour of maintaining NIV and physicians with an opinion in favour of withdrawing NIV

From: The opinion of French pulmonologists and palliative care physicians on non-invasive ventilation during palliative sedation at end of life: a nationwide survey

 

Withdrawing (n = 369)

Maintaining (n = 88)

p

Female gender

202 (54.7)

54 (61.4)

0.26

Age (years)

45.7 ± 12.1

45.0 ± 12.2

0.64

Status of physicians,

 Senior practitioner

351 (95.1)

86 (97.7)

0.39

 Professor

18 (4.9)

2 (2.3)

Speciality of physicians

 Pulmonologists

145 (39.3)

57 (64.8)

< 0.001

 Palliative care physicians

224 (60.7)

31 (35.2)

Training in palliative care

245 (66.4)

39 (44.3)

< 0.001

Training in NIV

122 (33.1)

39 (44.3)

0.047

Training in NIV and palliative care

37 (10.0)

7 (8.0)

0.55

Experience of NIV use at EOL with palliative sedation

217 (58.8)

60 (68.2)

0.11

Doctor uneasy in deciding to withdraw NIV

105/217 (48.4)

40/60 (66.7)

0.012

Personal ethics support maintaining NIV

24 (6.5)

47 (53.4)

< 0.001

Spending time looking for AD in the patient’s file

310 (84.0)

84 (95.4)

0.005

  1. Data are presented as frequencies (associated percentages), or mean ± standard deviation. EOL end of life, NIV non-invasive ventilation, AD advanced directives