Categories | Sub-themes | Themes |
---|---|---|
Reminder of pending death | Assessment of potential patient-burden | Shifting from objective measures to assessing priorities for patients |
Patients’ capacity to handle the technology | ||
Continuity | Assessment of potential patient-benefit | |
Coordinated services | ||
HCPs experiences of “getting closer” | ||
Increased possibilities to help | ||
Expectations of patient’s feeling increased safety | ||
Possibilities to reach more patients | ||
Interaction with patients | Implementing a tailored service based on patient’s illness experiences | |
Medical measuring devices | ||
Messaging | ||
Patient training | ||
Individualized questions | ||
Addressing the religious and spiritual | ||
Individualizing is crucial | ||
Close cooperation facilitates important decisions | Assessments when the patient’s condition changes | |
Need for clear measures | ||
Cancer-related issues | Knowledge and competence | Lack of experience and personal distress of cancer inhibited professional care |
The importance of personal suitability and experience | ||
Training and guiding of HCPs | ||
Cancer coordinator key-role | Work environment interactions | |
Communication and teamwork in decision-making | ||
Shared responsibility | ||
The service (remote home care?) is little known | Inadequate integration of documentation systems | Prominent organizational challenges questioned the premises of RHC |
A shift of increased responsibility to the patients | ||
Multiple service actors challenge the information-flow | ||
General practitioners | Interdisciplinary collaboration at the district level | |
Home Care Services | ||
Hospital | ||
Limitations in the application | Technological challenges | |
Possibilities in the application |