Skip to main content

Table 2 Anthropometric evaluation, body composition and nutritional status of older patients with cancer in palliative care

From: Effect of chocolate on older patients with cancer in palliative care: a randomised controlled study

VARIABLES

STUDY BASELINE

END OF STUDY

Mean ± standard deviation

Mean ± standard deviation

CG

IG1

IG2

CG

IG1

IG2

 

n = 15

n = 16

n = 15

n = 15

n = 15

n = 15

MNA Screening

 Score (mean ± standard deviation)

11.2 ± 1.4δ

9.5 ± 2.4β

10.5 ± 1.8

11.6 ± 0.6

10.9 ± 1.2

11 ± 1.5

 Nutritional status

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 Normal

10 (66.7)

9 (56.2)

7 (46.7)

10 (66.7)

8 (53.3)

9 (60.0)

 At risk of malnutrition

5 (33.3)

3 (18.7)

7 (46.7)

5 (33.3)

7 (46.7)

6 (40.0)

 Malnourished

0 (0)

4 (25.0)

1 (6.7)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

MNA Total Assessment

 Score (mean ± standard deviation)

24.7 ± 1.8α

22.6 ± 3.9

23.9 ± 3.1

25.4 ± 1.5

24.7 ± 2.3

25.1 ± 2.5

 Nutritional status

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 Normal

11 (73.3)

9 (60.0%)

9 (60.0%)

12 (80.0)

10 (66.7)

13 (86.7)

 At risk of malnutrition

4 (26.7)

5 (33.3)

5 (33.3)

3 (20.0)

5 (33.3)

2 (13.3)

 Malnourished

0 (0)

2 (13.3)

1 (6.7)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Anthropometric evaluation

 Body mass index (Kg/m2)

29.3 ± 4.5*

26.2 ± 4.0

26.1 ± 3.7

29.3 ± 4.4**

26.3 ± 3.5

26.3 ± 3.8

 Arm circumference (cm)

32.4 ± 3.2

30.6 ± 3.5

29.8 ± 3.5

32.2 ± 3.4

30.7 ± 2.8

30.1 ± 3.2

 Calf circumference (cm)

37.5 ± 3.0

36.9 ± 3.9

37.5 ± 2.8

37.5 ± 3.1

37.2 ± 3.4

37.3 ± 3.2

Body composition by deuterium

 Total body water (%)

49.3 ± 7.0

48.9 ± 8.1

47.8 ± 7.0

51.5 ± 9.4

48.5 ± 7.4

48.9 ± 5.4

 Fat mass (%)

32.7 ± 9.6

33.2 ± 11.1

34.7 ± 9.6

29.6 ± 12.8

33.7 ± 10.1

33.2 ± 7.3

 Lean mass (%)

67.3 ± 9.4

66.8 ± 11.1

65.3 ± 9.6

70.4 ± 12.8

66.3 ± 10.1

66.8 ± 7.3

  1. CG control group, IG1 intervention group 1 (chocolate with 55% cocoa), IG2 intervention group 2 (white chocolate), n number, % percentage, Kg Kilogram, MNA Mini Nutritional Assessment
  2. δ p < 0.01 vs. IG1; α p = 0.04 vs. IG1; β p < 0.01 baseline vs. end; ∞ p = 0.04 baseline vs. end; * p = 0.04 vs. IG1 and IG2; ** p = 0.03 vs. IG1