Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Krug |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 8 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Barclay |
| 27 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miranda Fyfe |
| 27 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Petchey |
| 28 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Liz Mather |
| 8 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Krug |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 27 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Barclay |
| 28 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Petchey |
| 30 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Krug |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 30 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 1 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Krug |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 1 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-684X-11-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.