Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Krug |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
9 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Barclay |
27 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miranda Fyfe |
27 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Petchey |
28 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Liz Mather |
8 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Krug |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Barclay |
28 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Petchey |
30 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Krug |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
30 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Krug |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
1 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-684X-11-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.