Peer Review reports
From: End of life content in geriatric textbooks: what is the current situation?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sheila Payne |
| 10 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alexandra Easson |
| 22 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Albert J. Kirshen |
| 6 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - farida malik |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 17 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - farida malik |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 17 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - farida malik |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 31 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - farida malik |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 31 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 31 May 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 May 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-684X-5-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.