Skip to main content

Table 2 Item and factor analysis

From: Development the Care Evaluation Scale Version 2.0: a modified version of a measure for bereaved family members to evaluate the structure and process of palliative care for cancer patient

 

Standardized regression coefficients

Communarity

Missing value (%)

Pearson's r b

ICC c

 

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

F8

F9

F10

V. Explanation to family by phsician (mean = 82, SD = 17)

 13. Physician gave sufficient explanation to the family about condition and the medical treatment.a

0.95

−0.10

−0.03

0.01

0.06

−0.01

0.08

−0.02

0.02

0.00

0.92

2.03

0.95

0.76

 14. Physician gave easy-to-understand explanation to the family about condition and the medical treatment.

0.91

0.00

−0.01

−0.03

0.03

−0.05

0.10

−0.01

−0.02

0.11

0.94

2.28

0.96

0.70

 15. Consideration is given so that the family would participate in the selection of treatment.

0.86

0.08

0.05

−0.05

0.04

−0.08

0.03

0.09

0.06

−0.02

0.91

2.54

0.94

0.75

III. Pycho-existential care (mean = 84, SD = 16)

 7. Physicans, nurses and staff endevered to relieve patient’s concerns and worries.a

0.09

0.74

0.00

0.04

0.06

−0.16

0.22

0.03

0.03

0.06

0.90

2.79

0.96

0.69

 8. Physicans, nurses and staff endevored to relieve patient’s sadness and depression.

−0.03

0.84

−0.02

0.07

0.07

0.02

0.06

−0.04

−0.01

0.10

0.93

3.55

0.96

0.69

 9. Physicans, nurses and staff endevered so that the patient’s hope would be accomplished.

0.12

0.83

0.04

0.04

0.04

0.12

−0.09

−0.05

0.00

−0.03

0.91

2.79

0.93

0.64

IX. Availability (mean = 82, SD = 17)

 23. Admission (use) is possible when necessary without waiting.a

0.01

0.13

0.95

−0.01

−0.10

0.07

−0.06

0.02

−0.08

−0.10

0.88

8.12

0.90

0.70

 24. The procedures of admission (use) are simple.

0.02

−0.02

0.89

−0.03

0.08

−0.05

0.02

0.01

0.03

−0.03

0.85

8.38

0.89

0.60

 25. Admission (use) is in accordance with the wishes of the patient and family.

−0.01

−0.14

0.83

0.01

0.09

−0.05

0.14

−0.01

0.06

0.18

0.86

8.88

0.88

0.66

VI. Environment (mean = 78, SD = 20)

 16. Hospital or room was convenient and comfortable.a

−0.02

0.05

−0.02

0.82

0.07

0.01

0.09

−0.19

0.15

0.04

0.87

1.27

0.92

0.60

 17. Environment was quiet and calm .

−0.03

−0.10

−0.05

0.87

0.09

−0.11

0.04

0.23

−0.08

0.14

0.90

3.55

0.89

0.59

 18. Toilet and washstand facilities was convinient.

0.00

0.13

0.04

0.91

−0.12

0.10

−0.05

0.07

0.00

−0.16

0.87

5.84

0.90

0.74

X. Coordination and consistency (mean = 80, SD = 17)

 26. There is good cooperation among staff members such as physicians and nurses.a

−0.08

0.19

0.07

−0.06

0.80

0.03

−0.02

0.07

0.01

0.04

0.90

2.03

0.93

0.72

 27. Important information was shared even when the attending physician or nurse was changed.

0.03

0.07

−0.03

−0.01

0.93

−0.03

0.11

−0.03

−0.02

−0.06

0.94

3.30

0.95

0.72

 28. Treatment is planned with appropriate consideration of the previous course of the disease.

0.23

−0.06

0.07

0.09

0.81

0.14

−0.16

−0.04

−0.01

−0.06

0.92

4.31

0.92

0.72

I. Physical care by physician (mean = 85, SD = 15)

 1. Physicans endevered to relieve physical discomfort of the patienta

0.08

−0.01

−0.02

0.02

0.06

0.77

0.17

0.08

0.01

−0.04

0.91

1.27

0.93

0.70

 2. Physicans deal promptly with discomforting physical symptoms of the patient

−0.05

−0.03

0.04

0.00

0.04

0.74

0.14

−0.02

0.03

0.24

0.88

2.79

0.93

0.67

 3. Physicans have adequate knowledge and skills to alleviate physical symptoms of the patient

0.18

0.14

−0.04

−0.01

0.04

0.67

0.11

0.01

−0.02

0.00

0.89

2.79

0.91

0.71

II. Physical care by nurse (mean = 83, SD = 18)

 4. Nurses endevered to relieve physical discomfort of the patienta

0.12

−0.07

0.01

0.10

−0.04

0.26

0.83

−0.07

−0.04

−0.11

0.92

3.81

0.92

0.64

 5. Nurses deal promptly with discomforting physical symptoms of the patient

0.00

0.32

0.12

0.05

−0.05

−0.01

0.73

−0.02

−0.02

0.03

0.93

3.55

0.93

0.70

 6. Nurses have adequate knowledge and skills to alleviate physical symptoms of the patient

−0.05

0.38

−0.11

−0.18

0.11

0.16

0.49

0.16

0.07

−0.03

0.82

3.30

0.91

0.70

VIII. Consideration with family health (mean = 77, SD = 16)

 21. Consideration was given to the health of familya

−0.01

−0.09

0.03

−0.02

0.00

0.11

−0.04

0.86

0.12

0.07

0.89

3.81

0.94

0.59

 22. Consideration was given so that the family could have their own time and continue to work

0.05

0.07

0.00

0.10

−0.01

−0.05

0.02

0.93

−0.05

−0.04

0.91

5.33

0.94

0.50

VII. Cost (mean = 74, SD = 19)

 19. The total cost is reasonable.a

0.04

0.10

−0.06

0.06

0.00

−0.06

0.04

−0.02

0.89

0.02

0.93

7.11

0.95

0.60

 20. The contents of the bills are easy to understand.

0.02

−0.05

0.06

0.01

−0.01

0.07

−0.07

0.08

0.94

−0.06

0.93

10.41

0.95

0.65

IV. Explanation to patient by phsician (mean = 80, SD = 18)

 10. Physician gave sufficient explanation to the patient about condition and the medical treatment.a

0.38

0.25

0.01

−0.03

−0.08

0.12

−0.11

−0.02

0.04

0.59

0.93

3.55

0.94

0.68

 11. Physician gave easy-to-understand explanation to the patient about condition and the medical treatment.

0.41

0.11

−0.03

0.01

−0.02

0.12

−0.03

0.07

−0.07

0.63

0.95

2.03

0.96

0.67

 12. Consideration is given so that the patient would participate in the selection of treatment.

0.26

0.14

0.09

0.05

−0.04

0.22

−0.10

−0.03

0.01

0.55

0.84

5.58

0.90

0.70

  1. aitems of short version
  2. bPearson’s correlation coefficient with each subscale total score
  3. cintraclass correlation coefficient