Skip to main content

Table 3 Number and proportion (%) of physicians deciding to withhold an intervention in the patient scenario according to physician groups

From: Does special education in palliative medicine make a difference in end-of-life decision-making?

Treatment

Scenario

Competency in PM

Surgeons

Internists

GPs

Oncologists

P-valuea

Blood transfusion

Original scenario

60

(91)

98

(70)*

108

(72)*

185

(76)*

72

(78)*

0.011

Family’s appeal

55

(85)

90

(64)*

85

(56)**

153

(64)*

67

(76)

< 0.001

Advance directive

66

(99)

132

(94)

136

(91)

227

(94)

90

(98)

0.134

Pleural drainage

Original scenario

43

(65)

59

(42)*

85

(56)

99

(41)**

58

(64)

< 0.001

Family’s appeal

41

(63)

57

(40)*

73

(49)

89

(37)**

51

(56)

< 0.001

Advance directive

53

(79)

103

(73)

119

(80)

179

(74)

82

(89)

0.030

Chest X-ray

Original scenario

51

(77)

66

(47)**

88

(58)*

119

(60)**

67

(73)

< 0.001

Family’s appeal

44

(67)

61

(43)*

74

(49)*

29

(38)**

59

(65)

< 0.001

Advance directive

59

(88)

111

(79)

124

(83)

194

(81)

90

(98)*

0.001

Laboratory tests

Original scenario

49

(74)

70

(59)*

87

(57)*

121

(50)*

59

(64)

0.002

Family’s appeal

40

(61)

60

(43)*

67

(45)*

85

(35)**

51

(56)

< 0.001

Advance directive

58

(87)

115

(81)

119

(78)

190

(78)

88

(96)*

0.006

  1. PM, Palliative Medicine, GP, General Practitioner
  2. aGlobal p-value across all physician groups
  3. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.001 pair-wise comparison to physicians with special competency in PM