Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of measured variables collected during on-going palliative care and one year after the patient’s death

From: Can a single question about family members’ sense of security during palliative care predict their well-being during bereavement? A longitudinal study during ongoing care and one year after the patient’s death

Variable domain

Measures

Origin

Family member demographics

Age, gender, living and family conditions, education, country of birth, relationship to the patient, and main occupation

*

Health-related quality of life

The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), including five subscales: mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status; 3-point response scale: 1 (no problems) - 3 (severe problems).

 

An index score was calculated for each respondent’s health status: 1 = full health; −  0.594 = worst-imaginable health state

[21]

General quality of life: one question (of 100) from the WHO QOL 100 instrument; 5-point scale: 1 (very poor) – 5 (very good)

[22]

General health: one overall question from the SF-36 (a 36-item short-form health survey questionnaire); 5-point scale: 1 (excellent health) – 5 (poor health)

[23]

Stress and coping

Stress: two (of ten) items from the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (felt nervous and “stressed”; difficulties were piling up so high that you could not overcome them); 5-point scale: 0 (never) – 4 (very often)

[24]

Worry about personal finances during the last month: 5-point scale: 0 (never) – 4 (very often)

*

Self-efficacy: One statement (of ten; I can solve most problems if I invest the necessary effort) from the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE); 4-point scale: 1 (not at all true) – 4 (exactly true)

[25, 26]

Religious or existential belief that helps the informant to cope with problems: One statement; 4-point scale: 1 (not at all true) – 4 (exactly true)

*

Attachment security

the Experiences in Close Relationships scale (ECR-M16); 16 items to measure attachment anxiety (fear of rejection and abandonment) and avoidance (discomfort with closeness and dependence on close others) in close relationships (including non-romantic partners); 7-point scale: 1 (lower attachment insecurity) - 7 (greater attachment insecurity)

[27]

Situation as family member to a severely ill person

Type of support/care the family member provided to the ill person: eight alternatives; yes/no (see Table 1)

*

Extent of support the family member provided to the ill person: one question; 6-point scale: 1 (around-the-clock) – 6 (no need of support)

*

Geographical distance between housing of patient and family member: one question; 6-point scale: 1 (same household) - 6 (more than 1-h distance)

*

The family member’s perception of being a family caregiver: the COPE questionnaire: 15 questions; 4 point scale: 1 (never) – 4 (always) based on 3 validated sub-scales: Negative impact scale, Positive value scale and Quality of support scale

[28]

Possibility of respite if family member needed a break: one question; 3-point scale: 1 (no) – 2 (yes, with some difficulty) – 3 (yes, easy)

*

Possibility of respite if family member became ill: one question; 3-point scale: 1 (no) – 2 (yes, with some difficulty) – 3 (yes, easy)

*

Support from family, relatives, and friends

The family member’s perception of support from members within the closest family: one question; 6-pointscale: 1(never) – 6 (always)

*

The family member’s perception of support from other family members, relatives or friends: one question; 6-pointscale: 1(never) – 6 (always)

*

The family member’s perception of support to patient from other family members, relatives or friends: one question; 6-pointscale: (1 (never) - 6 (always))

*

Sense of security in palliative care

The family members’ sense of security with palliative care: The sense of security in care-Relatives’ Evaluation instrument (15-item instrument (6-point scale: 1 (never) - 6 (always) based on 3 validated sub-scales: Care Interaction (eight items), Mastery (four items) and Patient Situation (three items)

[20]

Time (days) from commencement of palliative home care services () to the interview (with the family member)

Medical records

Patient characteristics

Demographics: age, gender, living and family conditions, and country of birth.

*

Diagnosis: the patient’s diagnosis and the time since diagnosis.

Medical records

(Family member’s perception of) Patient having difficulties with memory: one questions; 5-point response scale: 1 (never) – 5 (very often)

*

(Family member’s perception of) Patient having changed behavior: one questions; 5-point response scale: 1 (never) – 5 (very often)

*

Well-being during bereavement

The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), see above “Health-related quality of life” domain

[21]

General quality of life, one question from the WHO QOL 100 instrument, see above

[22]

General health: one overall question from the SF-36, see above “Health-related quality of life” domain

[23]

Psychological well-being previous 2 weeks: The WHO-5 Well-being Index 6–30 (five items; 6-point scale: 1(‘at no time’) – 6 (‘all of the time’))

[29]

Stress: two (of ten) items from the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS); see above “Stress and coping” domain

[24]

Had own contact with healthcare because of the death of the patient (that received care by the palliative care unit); 4-point scale: 1(never) - 4(> 5 times)

*

Complicated grief symptoms: Inventory of complicated grief screen (ICGS) is a 9-item shortened version of the original ICG; 5-point scale: 1(never) - 5(always)

[30, 31]

  1. *Questionnaire developed by the authors