Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Assessing the validity of the clinician-rated distress thermometer in palliative care

Original Submission
3 Dec 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristine Donovan
8 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonia Bennett
13 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Axelle Van Lander
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristine Donovan
10 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonia Bennett
6 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Axelle Van Lander
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Axelle Van Lander
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Axelle Van Lander
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Axelle Van Lander
Resubmission - Version 6
25 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
4 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Axelle Van Lander
Resubmission - Version 7
4 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 7
31 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Axelle Van Lander
Resubmission - Version 8
31 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 8
6 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Axelle Van Lander
Resubmission - Version 9
6 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 9
28 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Axelle Van Lander
Resubmission - Version 10
28 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
16 Sep 2019 Editorially accepted
17 Oct 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12904-019-0466-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page