Skip to main content

Table 3 Categorized reasons why some items were rated as little or not relevant by the participants

From: Correction to: Content validation of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL with advanced cancer patients and health care professionals from palliative care services in Chile

Scale/item

Item

Relevancea

Technical issuesb

Inappropriatec

Relatived

Not importante

Difficultf

Total

  

Pts.

HCPs

Pts.

HCPs

Pts.

HCPs

Pts.

HCPs

Pts.

HCPs

Pts.

HCPs

 

Pain

9

   

1

        

1

 

19

 

3

 

1

 

2

1

     

7

Physical functioning

1

5

5

  

3

3

1

     

17

 

2

4

6

1

1

1

 

1

 

1

1

  

16

 

3

4

6

1

2

1

1

1

 

1

   

17

 

4

3

   

2

1

1

    

1

8

 

5

            

–

Emotional functioning

21

1

5

1

2

 

1

 

1

 

1

1

 

13

 

22

1

5

2

1

  

1

 

1

1

  

12

 

23

 

1

4

5

  

1

  

1

  

12

 

24

 

2

 

3

  

1

     

6

Fatigue

10

 

5

 

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

  

10

 

12

 

3

2

3

 

1

2

    

1

12

 

18

1

4

1

  

1

2

  

1

  

10

Nausea and vomiting

14

1

2

 

2

        

5

 

15

 

2

 

1

        

3

Sleeping difficulties

11

   

1

        

1

Social functioning

26

1

   

1

1

1

  

1

  

5

 

27

 

1

 

2

2

 

1

  

2

  

8

Dyspnea

8

3

5

14

13

1

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

39

Role functioning

6

2

1

 

3

     

1

  

7

 

7

4

11

 

1

1

2

1

     

20

Constipation

16

 

1

10

7

        

18

Lack of appetite

13

 

1

          

1

Financial difficulties

28

1

2

 

1

2

1

    

1

 

8

Global health status/

29

 

2

1

        

1

4

Quality of life

30

 

1

2

3

 

1

1

   

1

1

10

Cognitive functioning

20

4

11

 

1

 

1

   

4

  

21

 

25

1

8

 

1

   

1

    

11

Diarrhea

17

 

3

  

1

  

1

    

5

Total

 

36

96

39

56

15

17

18

3

5

14

4

4

307

  1. a Relevance: statements concerning the degree of relevance, i.e., replicating the quantitative data
  2. b Technical issues: statements that the question is not well formulated, reiterative or suggestions to combine items
  3. c Inappropriate: statements that the item was inappropriate
  4. d Relative: statements that the symptom or problem asked in the item depend of patient’s diagnosis
  5. e Not important: statements that the item was not important in palliative care
  6. f Difficult: the item was seen has difficult to understand
  7. Patients: Pts., health care professionals: HCPs