Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary Statistics

From: Using natural language processing to explore heterogeneity in moral terminology in palliative care consultations

 

Total sample (n = 231)

% (n=)

 

Total sample (n = 231)

% (n=)

Age in years

 

Spiritual needs by rel. Community

 

  < 55

27 (62)

 Completely

23 (53)

 55–70

45 (104)

 Quite a bit

16 (37)

  > 70

28 (65)

 Moderately

8 (18)

Gender

 

 Slightly

11 (25)

 Female

49 (113)

 Not at all

42 (97)

 Male

51 (118)

Spiritual needs by medical system

 

Race/Ethnicity

 

 Completely

14 (32)

 White

79 (182)

 Quite a bit

15 (35)

 Black or Hispanic

21 (49)

 Moderately

14 (32

Highest education

 

 Slightly

15 (35)

 Did not graduate high school

16 (37)

 Not at all

42 (97)

 High school graduate or GED

29 (67)

Emotional problems

 

 Associate Degree / Technical School

27 (62)

 Not at all

14 (32)

 Bachelor’s Degree

12 (28)

 Slightly

22 (51)

 Masters or Doctorate Degree

16 (37)

 Moderately

18 (42)

Financial security

 

 Quite a bit

30 (69)

 Secure

34 (79)

 Extremely

16 (37)

 Partially secure

28 (65)

Bothered/prognostic uncertainty

 

 Insecure

38 (88)

 Not at all

10 (23)

Religion

 

 Slightly

13 (30)

 Christianity

67 (155)

 Moderately

27 (62)

 Other

9 (21)

 Quite a bit

30 (69)

 None

24 (55)

 Extremely

20 (46)

EOL preference for comfort directed treatment

 

Feeling “at peace”

 

 Strongly Disagree

7 (16)

 Completely

7 (16)

 Disagree

3 97)

 Quite a bit

15 (35)

 Uncertain

22 (51)

 Moderately

31 (72)

 Agree

15 (35)

 Slightly

27 (62)

 Strongly Agree

54 (125)

 Not at all

20 (46)