Skip to main content

Table 4 Perceived service enhancement and perceived adequacy of technological capability or innovation by area

From: Palliative care providers’ use of digital health and perspectives on technological innovation: a national study

 

All respondents

(N = 154)

Metro

(N = 99)

Regional

(N = 49)

Remote

(N = 6)

Item

Mean (SD)

Min-Max

N

Mean (SD)

Min-Max

N

Mean (SD)

Min-Max

N

Mean (SD)

Min-Max

N

Confident utilising digital health to provide PC

3.72 (0.89)

1.00–5.00

148

3.70 (0.87)

1.00–5.00

94

3.81 (0.87)

1.00–5.00

48

3.17 (1.33)

1.00–4.00

6

 Missing

  

6

  

5

  

1

  

PC can be enhanced through digital health

4.21 (0.69)

1.00–5.00

145

4.27 (0.63)

3.00–5.00

92

4.17 (0.78)

1.00–5.00

48

3.60 (0.55)

3.00–4.00

5

 Missing

  

9

  

7

  

1

  

1

Supportive of ongoing innovation through digitally enabled models of care that improve quality and access to PC

4.27 (0.75)

1.00–5.00

149

4.38 (0.57)

3.00–5.00

95

4.13 (0.89)

1.00–5.00

48

3.67 (1.56)

1.00–5.00

6

 Missing

  

5

  

4

  

1

  

Concerned about the safety and confidentiality of patient information in digital health

3.15 (1.01)

1.00–5.00

148

3.16 (0.98)

1.00–5.00

95

3.15 (0.98)

1.00–5.00

47

3.00 (1.67)

1.00–5.00

6

 Missing

  

6

  

4

  

2

  

Do not have access to sufficient technical help to support me using digital health applications

2.91 (1.03)

1.00–5.00

148

2.95 (1.05)

1.00–5.00

94

2.79 (0.90)

1.00–5.00

48

3.33 (1.63)

1.00–5.00

6

 Missing

  

6

  

5

  

1

  

Would like access to training and/or educational resources to support my use of digital health in PC

3.88 (0.77)

1.00–5.00

147

3.88 (0.78)

1.00–5.00

93

3.90 (0.66)

2.00–5.00

48

3.83 (1.47)

1.00–5.00

6

 Missing

  

7

  

6

  

1

  

  1. PC Palliative Care