Study | Location | Aim | Design/Methodology | Participants |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fauriel et al. (2004) [34] | France, Switzerland, Belgium, Luxembourg | To evaluate withdrawal of LST in all nephrology centres in French-speaking European countries | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-directed, face-to-face interviews; Analysis done by two researchers independently | 31 paediatric nephrologists involved in LST decisions 17 males; aged 33–61 years, mean 48.5 years; paediatric practice 3–34 years, mean 18.2 years [50 children] |
De Graves and Aranda (2005) [35] | Australia | To explore the challenges and complexities when caring for a child with cancer no longer responding to curative therapy, and identify what issues and dilemmas arise when cure is no longer an appropriate goal of treatment | Explorative qualitative approach using participatory group discussions and in-depth interviews; Thematic analysis | 6 haematology/oncology consultants [5 registered nurses, 3 haematology/oncology social workers] |
Fauriel et al. (2005) [36] | France, Switzerland, Belgium, Luxembourg. | To describe the criteria on which decisions to withhold or withdraw LST were based | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-directed, face-to-face interviews; Analysis done by two researchers independently | 46 paediatric nephrologists 30 males, 16 females; aged 33–68 years, mean 50.4 years |
Carnevale et al. (2011) [37] | Italy | To describe how LST decisions are made for critically ill children; and how these decisional processes are experienced by physicians, nurses and parents | Explorative qualitative approach using focus group discussions; Follow grounded theory; Thematic analysis | 16 physicians practicing in the care of critically ill children 10 males, 6 females; aged 30–57 years, median 42 years; paediatric practice 0.66–28 years, median 13 years [26 nurses, 9 parents] |
Carnevale et al. (2012) [38] | France, Canada | To examine how physicians and nurses make decisions about LST for critically ill children and corresponding ethical challenges | Explorative qualitative approach using focus group discussions; Follow grounded theory; Thematic analysis | 21 physicians 11 males, 10 females; aged 29–58 years; paediatric practice 0.17–29 years [24 nurses] |
Meyer et al. (2012) [39] | United States | To explore how practitioners respond to the question ‘What would you do if this were your child?’ | Explorative qualitative approach using descriptive interviews; Thematic analysis | 15 physicians [8 nurses, 1 social worker, 1 physical therapist] |
Michelson et al. (2013) [40] | United States | To describe issues important in PICU EOL care decision-making and identify possible methods for improving the decision-making process for parents | Retrospective qualitative approach using focus group discussion | 13 physicians [23 nurses, 6 social workers, 4 chaplains, 1 child-life specialist, 1 case manager, 18 parents] |
Pye (2013) [41] | United Kingdom | To explore perceptions of doctors and nurses working in a pediatric oncology unit regarding experiences and feelings concerning moral distress | Explorative qualitative approach using descriptive phenomenology; Follow Colaizzi descriptive framework; Thematic analysis | 4 physicians [4 nurses] |
Bartholdson et al. (2015) [42] | Sweden | To describe healthcare professionals’ experiences of ethical issues and ways to deal with these when caring for children with cancer | Explorative qualitative approach using open-ended questions; Qualitative content analysis | 15 physicians [72 nurses] |
Boss et al. (2015) [43] | United States | To explore pediatric clinicians’ experiences with LST prior to the MOLST mandate and to describe clinician and family concerns and preferences regarding pediatric MOLST | Explorative qualitative approach using focus group discussions; Analysis done by two researchers independently | 69 physicians [27 nurses]h8 |
De Vos et al. (2015) [44] | The Netherlands | To answer the questions: How do physicians and parents communicate about decisions to withhold or withdraw LST, and to what extent do parents share in the decision-making process? | Prospective explorative approach; Qualitative and quantitative analysis | 27 physicians 15 males, 12 females; paediatric practice, 12 were 0–5 years, 2 were 5–10 years, 13 were ≥ 10 years [37 parents] |
Forbat et al. (2015) [45] | United Kingdom | To explore health professionals and family experiences of conflict in pediatric services | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Thematic analysis | 20 physicians [10 nurses, 8 parents, 3 chaplains, 2 lawyers, 2 Patient Advice and Liaison Service, 1 hospice head of care] |
Lotz et al. (2015) [46] | Germany | To investigate the attitudes, barriers, and benefits as well as requirements for pediatric ACP | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Content analysis | 9 physicians [6 nurses, 2 social professionals] |
Mitchell & Dale (2015) [47] | United Kingdom | To investigate current practice in ACP and how this might be improved, by exploring the experiences and perceptions of senior PICU medical and nursing staff who are frequently involved in managing EOL care for children and young people | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Thematic content analysis | 8 PICU consultants [6 nurses] |
Bartholdson et al. (2016) [48] | Sweden | To explore healthcare staff’s experiences of participating in ECR sessions in childhood cancer care | Explorative qualitative observations of ethics care reflection sessions and qualitative interviews; Follow grounded theory | 15 physicians in ECR session, 2 physicians in individual interviews 13 males, 2 female in ECR; 2 males in interviews [18 nurses, 1 therapist, 1 psychologist in ECR session, 8 nurses in individual interviews] |
Bateman et al. (2016) [49] | United States | To describe communication between physician and the actor parent of a standardized 8-year-old patient in respiratory distress who is nearing the EOL | Explorative qualitative approach using high-fidelity simulation; Follow grounded theory; Thematic analysis | 13 paediatric emergency medicine and paediatric critical care fellows 8 males, 5 females |
Lotz et al. (2016) [50] | Germany, Switzerland | To investigate which factors paediatricians apply in deciding about medical indication, and how they manage conflicts with parents | Explorative qualitative approach using low-structured and case-based focus group discussions; Content analysis | 17 experienced paediatricians 12 males, 5 females; mean age 44 years, mean practice experience 16 years |
Zaal-Schuller et al. (2016) [51] | The Netherlands | To compare the experiences of parents and physicians who were involved in the EOL decision-making process of the same child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities | Retrospective qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Coding done by two researchers independently | 11 physicians 2 males, 9 females; aged 40–60 [14 children, 17 parents] |
Badarau et al. (2017) [52] | Switzerland, Romania | To explore views of parents and physicians on decision-making in paediatric oncology | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Thematic analysis | 26 physicians Aged 30–62 [37 parents] |
Birchley et al. (2017) [53] | United Kingdom | To critically describe the way in which the best interests standard operates in PICU | Explorative qualitative approach using interviews; Thematic analysis | 10 physicians [14 parents, 8 nurses, 7 clinical ethics committee] |
Cicero-Oneto et al. (2017) [54] | Mexico | To explore in-depth the EOL decision-making process and to identify the ethical principles that guide decision-making | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured, in-depth interviews; Thematic analysis | 13 oncologists 5 males; aged 32–52; practical experience 1–20 years, median 7 years [13 parents, 6 adolescents] |
Odeniyi et al. (2017) [55] | United States | To identify oncologists’ and intensivists’ perceived barriers to, and resources for, communication with families of children with cancer, and how the oncologist-intensivist relationship impacts communication and initiation of goals of care discussions | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Thematic analysis | 10 paediatric oncology and intensive care physicians 5 males |
Richards et al. (2018) [56] | United States | To understand how critical care physicians balance and integrate the interests of the child and family in decisions about LST | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Thematic and content analysis | 22 physicians 15 males, 7 females; work experience 10 have ≤5 years, 12 have ≥5 years |
Needle et al. (2019) [57] | United States | To explore the perspectives of PICU and hematopoietic stem cell transplant healthcare professionals as related to informed decision making of adolescents and the value of advance directives in paediatric practice | Explorative qualitative approach using focus group discussions; Content analysis | 15 physicians 8 males; aged 29–62 years, mean 40 years; practice experience 1–31 years, mean 10 years |
Sasazuki et al. (2019) [58] | Japan | To delineate the decision-making processes that paediatricians apply when treating children with life-threatening conditions and the psychosocial experience of paediatricians involved in such care | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Comprehensive qualitative and content analysis | 15 paediatricians 14 males, 1 female; aged 30–54 years |
Ekberg et al. (2020) [59] | Australia | To explore how discussions about deterioration are managed within actual paediatric palliative care consultations. | Explorative observative approach; Follow grounded theory; Conversation analysis | 7 healthcare professionals |
Jongaramraung et al. (2020) [60] | Thailand | To investigate EOL decisions for children in PICU | Explorative qualitative approach using in-depth interviews; Follow naturalistic inquiry | 2 physicians [17 nurses] |
Orkin et al. (2020) [61] | Canada | To develop an in-depth understanding of the ACP experience for children with medical complexity | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Content analysis | 8 physicians [14 mothers, 2 nurses, 1 social worker] |
Fay et al. (2021) [62] | Mexico | To analyse the ways in which pediatric patients have agency in relation to their parents and palliative care professionals within the hospital setting, as well as the structural circumstances that constrain said agency | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Follow hospital ethnography; Thematic analysis | 1 general practitioner and 1 paediatrician Pediatric experience, general practitioner 10 months, paediatrician 5 years [2 psychologists] |
Verberne et al. (2021) [63] | The Netherlands | To explore how parents and healthcare professionals currently anticipate the future of the child and family in paediatric palliative care | Explorative qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews; Thematic analysis | 20 physicians [42 parents, 13 nurses, 1 psychologist, 1 child-life specialist] |