Skip to main content

Table 3 Barriers and facilitators for compassionate communities’ implementation

From: How compassionate communities are implemented and evaluated in practice: a scoping review

Factors

Description

Barriers

N*

%

Facilitators

N*

%

Attitudes

 

Cultural, religious, social

Social attitudes to receiving help, alignment of activities with cultural attitudes, differences (in cultural patterns, perceptions, roles, language), cultural and ethnic diversity

20

31.7

8

12.7

Support

Amount of support, type (ex. emotional, practical, medical), sources (ex. professional), formal/informal, political implication level

8

12.7

14

22.2

Collaboration & partnerships

Working together, sharing vision and mission, negotiating, relation between formal and informal networks, level of connections and commitment

8

12.7

12

12.0

Expectations

Assess and meeting: expectations, visions, needs, wishes of the patients, caregivers, communities, people

6

9.5

12

19.0

Interventions

Level of listening and communication, speaking quality, initiation of discussions opening, quality of community-based interventions design quality, caregiving practices combination, integrity and dedication acting

5

7.9

9

14.3

Leadership

Provide leadership not ownership, community empowerment, combined leadership, shared partnership

0

0

10

15.9

 

Knowledge

    

Information, awareness, promotion

Media reports and relations, level of awareness about the concept of end-of-life or palliative care, degree of knowledge (of the grieving process, etc.), awareness (of social roles, care needs, compassion, etc.), education program

6

9.5

17

26.0

Training, competencies, stakeholders experience

Training quality, competencies and experience levels

14

22.2

0

0

 

External factors

    

Location & timing

Spaces, site, setting (ex. home), travel/access (geographic and demographic context) technical implications, timing (for support), duration (of the support)

8

1.6

14

22.2

Finance

Amount of funding, financial implications, public financing, grants (quantity and continuity)

7

11.1

6

9.5

Resources

Availability and sustainability of resources, informal network, approach type, human resources

9

14.3

13

20.6

Policies, guidance, bureaucracy

Clarity of rules, organizing structure, level of coordination

10

15.9

0

0

Project (organization, development,

implementation, evaluation)

Participation, identification, integration, interests, involvement, recruitment (leaders, volunteers and clients), project definition and tangibility, evaluation (of the program, results, methodologies), clarity of objectives, professional structures

8

12.7

11

17.5

  1. *N = number of articles