Contributing mechanisms | Countering mechanisms | |
---|---|---|
Motivation to Address Conflict & Seek Agreement Patients & family/ guardians Healthcare practitioners | Conflict and disputes (n = 14) | Agreement seeking (n = 12) |
Conflict between practitioners and family on agreeing goals of care • Conflict between medical staff and family/guardians 5, 19, 20, 21, 32 (n = 5) • Conflict within the family 21, 64 (n = 2) | Getting patients and families to engage and seek consensus • Mandatory family meetings 18 (n = 1) • Patient’s wishes, explicitly sought 13, 18, 19 (n = 3) | |
Conflict and lack of consensus seeking demonstrated across practitioner groups • Discord and hierarchical ‘pulling rank’, between doctors and nurses or between senior doctors and junior doctors on what constitutes NBT 7, 18, 33, 43, 47, 53, 61, 65 (n = 8) | Practitioners seeking consensus and collaboration • Environments or interactions promoting collaboration within medical team 2, 12, 24, 40, 41, 43, 58, 61 (n = 8) • Reaching consensus across practitioner groups with multi-disciplinary meetings 36, 58 (n = 2) | |
Valuing Clear Communication and Sharing of Information Patients & family/ guardians | Misunderstandings and stonewalling (n = 13) | Sharing information well (n = 8) |
Misunderstanding of treatment and prognosis • Problem of not clearly communicating treatment and prognosis to lay people/patients 5, 10, 19, 22, 25, 29, 37, 42 (n = 8) Presence of medical paternalism • Lack of sufficient communication between clinicians and patient or family/guardian, such that agreement on goals of care is curtailed 5, 20, 27, 29, 43, 46, 50 (n = 7) | Public awareness and education • Awareness and education of what constitutes NBT and appropriate decision-making at EoL 5, 36, 37 (n = 3) | |
Healthcare practitioners | Poor communication within medical team • Lack of collaborative decision-making within medical team across groups (i.e. nurses, junior doctors, senior doctors) 12, 14, 33, 43, 48, 60 (n = 6) | Promoting ongoing dialogues among practitioners • Engaging practitioners in formal and informal communication on NBT 1, 3, 5, 18, 51, 52 (n = 6) |
Choices around Timing & Documenting of EoL Decisions Patients & family/ guardians Healthcare practitioners | Suboptimal timings and communication (n = 8) | Planning ahead well (n = 4) |
Engaging too late to agree goals of care, with inadequate communication tools • Discussions regarding EoL decision-making are delayed or stalled 10, 13, 50, 66 (n = 4) | Documenting patient decisions • Improved advanced care planning, do not resuscitate and goals of care documentation 1, 13, 50, 64, 66 (n = 5) | |
Fixed directives that don’t account for changing circumstances • Can oblige the practitioner to carry on with NBT that may be causing suffering in incapacitated patients 3, 23, 48, 64 (n = 4) | Consolidation and streamlining of care • Having a team leader or primary clinical point-of-contact (i.e. specialist nurse) to oversee decision-making process relating to NBT across entire hospitalization 10, 50 (n = 2) |