Skip to main content

Table 2 Determinants for implementing the MUTUAL intervention as measured by the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (N = 37)

From: Barriers and facilitators for healthcare professionals to the implementation of Multidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning conversations at the outpatient clinic (the MUTUAL intervention): a sequential exploratory mixed-methods study

  

N

Mean

SD

Disagree/ totally disagree (%)

Neutral (%)

Agree/totally agree (%)

Intervention (MUTUAL intervention)

 1

Procedural clarity: the ACP intervention clearly indicates the activities I should perform and in which order

37

4,05

0,57

0,0

13,5

86,5

 2

Correctness: the ACP intervention is based on factually correct knowledge

36

3,94

0,53

0,0

16,7

83,3

 3

Completeness: the ACP intervention provides the information and materials needed to perform the intervention properly

36

4,03

0,70

2,8

13,9

83,3

 4

Complexity: the ACP intervention is easy for me to use

36

4,00

0,63

2,8

11,1

86,1

 5

Compatibility: the ACP intervention is a good match for how I am used to working at the outpatient clinic

36

3,86

0,72

5,6

16,7

77,8

 6

Observability: the outcomes of using the ACP intervention are clearly observable

36

3,53

0,77

8,3

38,9

52,8

 7a

Relevance for patients: the ACP conversations are relevant for my patients

36

4,47

0,56

0,0

2,8

97,2

 7b

Relevance for their proxies: the ACP conversations are relevant for proxies of the patients

37

4,51

0,61

0,0

5,4

94,6

User

 8a

Personal benefits: the ACP intervention helps me to improve the quality of care

37

4,11

0,57

2,7

2,7

94,6

 8b

Personal benefits: the ACP intervention helps me to understand the wishes of my patient

36

4,11

0,62

2,8

5,6

91,7

 8c

Personal benefits: the ACP intervention improves the connection with my patient

36

3,61

0,73

8,3

27,8

63,9

 8d

Personal benefits: the ACP intervention improves follow-up conversations with my patient

36

3,44

0,77

5,6

47,2

47,2

 8e

Personal benefits: the ACP intervention saves time in the long term

36

3,56

0,81

8,3

38,9

52,8

 8f

Personal benefits: ACP conversations make me feel satisfied

36

3,81

0,71

5,6

19,4

75,0

 8g

Personal benefits: the ACP intervention contributes to my personal development

36

3,61

0,84

11,1

27,8

61,1

 8h

Personal benefits: the ACP intervention helps me to structure the conversation

36

3,78

0,83

8,3

22,2

69,4

 8i

Personal drawback: the ACP intervention is demanding for me

36

3,00

0,76

27,8

44,4

27,8 (barrier)

 8j

Personal drawback: the ACP intervention raises the workload

36

3,19

0,89

27,8

27,8

44,4 (barrier)

Outcome expectations

 9a

I expect that the ACP intervention enables the patient to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and carea

33

4,03

0,47

0,0

9,1

90,9

 9b

I expect that the ACP intervention enables the discussion of goals and preferences with family and healthcare professionalsa

33

4,21

0,42

0,0

0,0

100,0

 9c

I expect that the ACP intervention leads to the documentation of treatment preferencesa

33

4,24

0,50

0,0

3,0

97,0

 10a

Professional obligation: I feel that the ACP conversations are my responsibility as a professional

33

4,21

0,65

3,0

3,0

93,9

 10b

Professional obligation: I feel that the ACP conversations are the responsibility of the hospital

33

3,73

0,76

6,1

27,3

66,7

 10c

Professional obligation: I feel that the ACP intervention should always involve a physician

33

4,06

0,83

6,1

12,1

81,8

 11

Patient satisfaction: patients are generally satisfied with the ACP intervention

33

4,09

0,58

0,0

12,1

87,9

 12

Patient cooperation: patients generally cooperate with the ACP intervention

32

3,66

0,55

3,1

28,1

68,8

 13a

Social support: I can count on adequate assistance from my colleagues with the ACP intervention

33

3,91

0,68

0,0

27,3

72,7

 13b

Social support: I can count on adequate support from management with the ACP intervention

32

3,28

0,81

9,4

56,3

34,4

 14

Descriptive norm: the proportion of colleagues from my specialty who use the ACP interventionb

33

4,18

1,31

39,4

24,2

36,4

 15a

Normative beliefs: physicians from my specialty expect me to use the ACP interventiona

33

3,97

0,64

3,0

12,1

84,8

 15b

Normative beliefs: nurses from my specialty expect me to use the ACP interventiona

32

4,00

0,57

0,0

15,6

84,4

 15c

Normative beliefs: patients expect me to use the ACP interventiona

32

3,41

0,61

3,1

56,3

40,6

 15d

Normative beliefs: patients’ proxies expect me to use the ACP interventiona

32

3,34

0,60

3,1

62,5

34,4

 16a

Self-efficacy: Should you wish to do so, do you think you can select and invite patients for the ACP intervention?a

33

4,15

0,44

0,0

3,0

97,0

 16b

Self-efficacy: Should you wish to do so, do you think you are able to use the ACP intervention?a

33

4,33

0,54

0,0

3,0

97,0

 16c

Self-efficacy: Should you wish to do so, do you think you are able to document/register the goals and preferences from the ACP intervention?a

33

4,27

0,63

0,0

9,1

90,9

 17

Knowledge: I know enough to use the ACP intervention correctly

33

3,97

0,47

0,0

12,1

87,9

Organisation

 19

Formal ratification by management: there are formal arrangements relating to the ACP interventionc

37

2,35

0,59

5,4

54,1

40,5

 20a

Replacement when staff leave: if employees who are responsible for conducting ACP conversations leave the organisation, they are replaced in a timely manner by colleagues who are prepared to have ACP conversations

35

3,14

0,85

22,9

37,1

40,0

 20b

Replacement when staff leave: if employees that are responsible for planning ACP conversations leave the organisation, they are replaced in a timely manner by colleagues who are prepared to plan ACP conversations

34

3,15

0,74

14,7

52,9

32,4

 21

Staff capacity: there are enough people in our organisation to use the ACP intervention as intended

34

3,18

0,97

26,5

32,4

41,2

 22

Financial resources: there are enough financial resources available to use the intervention as intendedc

35

2,20

0,58

8,6

62,9

28,6

 23a

Time available: there is sufficient time available to introduce and invite patients to the ACP intervention at the outpatient clinic

36

3,28

0,97

25,0

16,7

58,3

 23b

Time available: there is sufficient time available to have the ACP conversations at the outpatient clinic as intended

37

3,41

0,93

18,9

24,3

56,8

 24

Material resources and facilities: our organisation provides me with enough materials and other resources or facilities necessary for using the ACP intervention as intended

36

3,69

0,75

11,1

13,9

75,0

 25

Coordinator: the coordinator of the ACP intervention is accessible

36

3,94

0,67

0,0

25,0

75,0

 26a

Unsettled organisation: the Covid-19 pandemic influences the ACP intervention

37

3,95

0,78

5,4

16,2

78,4 (barrier)

 26b

Unsettled organisation: there are other projects within the hospital that influence the ACP intervention d

33

1,27

0,45

27,3 (yes)

 

72,7 (no)

 27

Information accessible: easy to receive information about the ACP intervention

36

3,75

0,73

8,3

16,7

75,0

 28

Performance feedback: within the hospital feedback is regularly provided about progress with the implementation of the ACP intervention

36

3,78

0,76

5,6

25,0

69,4

Socio-political context

 29

Regulations: the ACP intervention fits well with existing legislation and regulations

36

3,75

0,50

0,0

27,8

72,2

  1. Numbers in bold represent a barrier reported by a HCP (≥ 20% disagrees/totally disagrees) or facilitator reported by a HCP (≥ 80% agrees/totally agrees). 8i, 8j, and 26a are barriers since the determinant concerns a negative response. The number of participants (N) answering the questions of the MIDI differs due to incomplete responses
  2. ACP advance care planning, MUTUAL MUltidisciplinary Timely Undertaken Advance Care Planning, HCP Healthcare professional
  3. a Answer categories were divided into 1 ‘most definitely not’, 2 ‘definitely not’, 3 ‘perhaps not, perhaps’, 4 ‘definitely’, 5 ‘most definitely’
  4. b Answer categories were divided into 1 ‘not a single colleague’, 2 ‘almost no colleague’, 3 ‘a minority’, 4 ‘half of colleagues’, 5 ‘a majority’, 6 ‘almost all colleagues’, 7 ‘all colleagues’
  5. c Answer categories were divided into 1 ‘no’, 2 ‘I don’t know’, 3 ‘yes’
  6. d Answer categories were divided into 1’no’, 2 ‘yes’