Study (Year) | Country | Design | Participants | Patients’ Disease Types | Care Settings | Aims | Themes/Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wichmann et al. [27] (2018) | Netherlands | Content analysis; semi-structured interviews; qualitative study | 17 GPs | Patients with cancer, heart failure, and COPD | Different clinics across the Netherlands | To identify the experiences of GPs in ACP conversations with palliative patients and the factors affecting these experiences. | Four themes: (1) ACP and society; (2) the role of GPs in ACP; (3) initiating ACP; (4) tailor-made ACP. |
Toguri et al. [28] (2020) | Canada | Thematic analysis; descriptive qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured, one-time, one-on-one interviews | 4 patients; 4 family members; 10 oncologists | Advanced cancer patients | Hospital: department of medical oncology and radiation oncology | To explore the understanding, experiences, reflections, and information needs of patients and their families regarding ACP, as well as physicians’ experiences in initiating ACP and their views on ACP training. | Five themes: (1) initiating ACP; (2) the relationship between patient and family influences and the progression of ACP; (3) limited formal training in ACP; (4) ACP requires teamwork; (5) lack of a coordinated health system. |
Sellars et al. [29] (2017) | Australia | Grounded theory; thematic analysis; semi-structured interviews; qualitative study | 20 nephrologists; 7 nurses; 4 social workers | Patients with chronic kidney disease | Clinics in different regions of Australia with experience in ACP for patients with CKD | To describe the experiences and perspectives of multidisciplinary clinicians regarding ACP, and to provide guidance and recommendations for the implementation of ACP for patients with chronic kidney disease. | Five themes: (1) promoting informed decision-making; (2) ethical challenges across moral boundaries; (3) navigating vulnerable conversations; (4) professional helplessness in initiating ACP; (5) clarified responsibilities. |
Schichtel et al. [22] (2021) | United Kingdom | Reflexive thematic analysis; semi-structured interviews; interpretive and descriptive study | 17 GPs; 7 nurses | Patients with heart failure | Rural and urban communities: primary health care institutions | To explore the promoting and hindering factors of implementing ACP for patients with heart failure to improve patients’ participation in ACP. | Three main themes: (1) ACP is an integral part of holistic health care in HF; (2) factors that may limit the doctor-patient relationship; (3) approaches to improving patients’ ACP participation. |
Robinson et al. [24] (2013) | United Kingdom | Thematic analysis; focus groups and individual interviews; qualitative study | 5 specialist palliative care professionals; 10 GPs; 17 community nurses and AHPs; 10 old-age psychiatrists; 22 mental health nurses and AHPs; 6 social workers; 15 ambulance service workers; 3 solicitors; 7 voluntary sector | Dementia patients | Clinical area of palliative care and dementia | To explore professionals’ experiences in the implementation of ACP for dementia and palliative care patients. | Four main themes: (1) the value of ACP; (2) delivering patient choice and achieving desired outcomes; (3) definition and legal issues of ACP; (4) three uncertain aspects of ACP practice: (a) who’s responsibility; (b) when to start; (c) what documentation is used. |
O’Hare et al. [25] (2016) | United States | Grounded theory; semi-structured, one-on-one interviews by phone or in person | 13 physicians; 6 nurses; 3 dialysis technicians; 2 dieticians; 2 social workers | Patients with advanced kidney disease | Multidisciplinary specialties (geriatric medicine, cardiology, intensive care, nephrology, palliative care, nursing, nutrition, physiatry, primary care, social work, and vascular surgery) at Health Care System | To explore multidisciplinary health professionals’ experiences in and perspectives on ACP for patients with advanced renal disease to determine ways to improve the participation rate of this population. | Four themes: (1) ACP is influenced by clinical setting, the role of different healthcare providers, and disease trajectory; (2) lack of a shared understanding and vision of the relationship between ACP and other relevant forgone life resuscitation discussions; (3) unclear responsibilities; (4) lack of active collaboration and communication. |
De Vleminck et al. [30] (2014) | Belgium | Constant comparative analysis; qualitative methodology of focus groups | 36 GPs | Patients with cancer, heart failure, and dementia | Palliative home care teams | From GPs’ perspectives, identify the barriers to initiating ACP and gain insight into the barrier differences between ACP trajectories in patients with cancer, heart failure, and dementia. | Two themes: (1) barriers to initiating ACP; (2) differences in ACP initiation barriers in patients with cancer, heart failure, and dementia. |
Menon et al. [26] (2018) | Singapore | Explorative qualitative study; focus groups; individual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews; inductive thematic analysis | 15 doctors; 13 nurses; 5 medical social workers; 15 patients; 13 caregivers | Patients with LLI | Multiple health care settings: areas such as geriatrics and family medicine tend to care for patients with life-limiting illnesses | To study the attitudes of patients with LLI, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals (that care for life-limited patients) toward ACP in a multicultural, family-centered community. | Seven themes: (1) ACP may cause loss of hope and/or depression; (2) ACP may not reflect patients’ preferences; (3) family members play an important role in decision-making, especially for elderly patients and those lacking capacity; (4) ACP may burden families; (5) ACP can bring benefits to all stakeholders; (6) society is not ready for ACP; (7) misunderstandings about laws governing medical care decisions for patients with and without capacity. |
Manthorpe et al. [31] (2019) | United Kingdom | Semi-structured interviews; framework analysis; exploratory study | 7 CPNs; 4 doctors; 3 social workers or occupational therapists | Dementia patients | Community mental health services | To explore community-based healthcare professionals’ understanding of the process, experiences, barriers, and contributing factors of ACP for patients with dementia. | Five themes: (1) ACP knowledge and experience; (2) use of ACP; (3) inhibitors of discussion; (4) service influences; (5) recommendations for future ACP implementation. |
Kuusisto et al. [17] (2021) | Finland | Qualitative descriptive study; focus group interviews; individual or couple interviews; inductive content analysis | 18 registered nurses; 5 practical nurses; 5 physicians; 5 social workers | Patients with cancer, COPD, and ALS | Palliative care unit in hospital ward or outpatient clinic | To describe medical professionals’ perceptions of ACP in palliative care units in hospital wards or outpatient settings. | Three themes: (1) ACP information content; (2) coordination of ACP care activities; (3) support patients and their families in coping. |
Hirakawa et al. [23] (2021) | Japan | Multicenter qualitative study; in-depth semi-structured interviews; content analysis | 7 physicians; 23 nurses; 4 care managers; 4 social workers | Patients with severe COPD | Palliative care services | To explore healthcare providers’ perceptions of ACP implementation in adult patients with severe COPD and challenges in facilitating ACP. | Five main themes based on the stakeholder education model: (1) daily decision-making; (2) sense of ethical decision-making; (3) in-depth interviewing skills; (4) collaborative information sharing among team members; (5) dissemination of knowledge about ACP. |