Reasons for high validation of the written report from the initial consultation reported by family caregivers and the treating specialists |
Family caregivers |
• content of the conversation is maintained |
• parental preferences are available for primary care teams for further treatment decisions |
• notes serve as an information source for all |
• notes are available for future reading |
Treating specialists |
• specialist gain insight in the topics discussed if they missed the consultation |
• official report including parental preferences strengthens the relationship with the PPCT |
• useful from the legal point of view, prevention of conflict |
Reasons for usefulness of the opportunity for family caregivers to give feedback on the report from the initial consultation reported by family caregivers and treating specialists |
• expectations of the family and the PPCT regarding the written report from the consultation is harmonized |
• understanding parental preferences is verified before being inserted to the official documentation |
• erasing controversial or highly personal information is possible when parents wish to do so |
• potential misunderstanding and misinterpretation of parental preferences is minimalized |
• supporting the shared-decision process with parents acting as partners in the debate |
• gesture of trust |