Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of the two most important strategies for each group in total and according to whether the participants had experience in palliative care

From: Communication strategies for adults in palliative care: the speech-language therapists’ perspective

Variable

Total

(n = 97)

With PC experience (n = 40)

Without PC experience (n = 57)

p-value

Environmental

    

Adjusting the patient’s position

   

0.517

Important

10 (10)

3 (8)

7 (12)

 

Very important

87 (90)

37 (93)

50 (88)

 

Minimising environmental noise *

   

0.935

Important

22 (23)

9 (23)

13 (23)

 

Very important

74 (77)

31 (78)

43 (77)

 

Non-verbal

    

Establishing eye contact

   

1.000

Important

5 (5)

2 (5)

3 (5)

 

Very important

92 (95)

38 (95)

54 (94)

 

Adjusting the pace of speech

   

0.767

Important

13 (13)

6 (15)

7 (12)

 

Very important

84 (87)

34 (85)

50 (88)

 

Verbal

    

Adjusting language level

   

0.792

Not very important

1 (1)

1 (3)

0 (0)

 

Important

5 (5)

2 (5)

3 (5)

 

Very important,

91 (94)

37 (93)

54 (95)

 

One topic at a time

   

1.000

Not very important

2 (2)

1 (3)

1 (2)

 

Important

7 (7)

3 (8)

4 (7)

 

Very important

88 (91)

36 (90)

52 (91)

 

Visuals

    

Images of interest to the patient

   

1.000

Not very important

1 (1)

0(0)

1 (2)

 

Important

16 (17)

7(18)

9 (16)

 

Very important

80 (83)

33(83)

47 (83)

 

Using patient’s personal belongings

   

0.829

Not very important

2 (2)

1 (3)

1 (2)

 

Important

27 (28)

10 (25)

17 (30)

 

Very important

68 (70)

29 (73)

39 (68)

 

Forms of communication

    

Multimodal

   

0.866

Not very important

1 (1)

0 (0)

1 (2)

 

Important

14 (14)

5 (13)

9 (16)

 

Very important

82 (85)

35 (88)

47 (83)

 

Oral

   

0.114

Important

17 (18)

4 (10)

13 (23)

 

Very important

80 (83)

36(90)

44 (77)

 

Formal strategies

    

Simplified language

   

0.549

Important

13 (13)

4 (10)

9 (16)

 

Very important

84 (87)

36 (90)

48 (84)

 

Structured pauses

   

1.000

Important

20 (21)

8 (20)

12 (21)

 

Very important

77 (79)

32 (80)

45 (79)

 

Assistive technologies

    

Table with images

   

0.523

Important

36 (37)

13 (33)

23 (40)

 

Very important

61 (63)

27 (68)

34 (60)

 

Book with pictures

   

0.356

Not very important

3 (3)

0 (0)

3 (5)

 

Important

43 (44)

19 (48)

24 (42)

 

Very important

51 (53)

21 (53)

30 (53)

 
  1. Legend: The data is presented as n (%) for each of the levels of importance reported. The p-value shown corresponds to the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for the comparison between the groups with and without experience in PC
  2. Caption: *One person did not answer this item