Skip to main content

Table 5 Satisfaction with the implementation of the intervention

From: “Being an informal caregiver – strengthening resources”: mixed methods evaluation of a psychoeducational intervention supporting informal caregivers in palliative care

Items

M (SD)

Rangea

Agreeb

n/N (%)

HeiQ-program

 1. I will tell people that the intervention is very worthwhile.

4.6 (0.8)

2-5

23/25 (92.0)

 2. The Intervention has helped me set reasonable and achievable goals.

3.7 (0.7)

2-5

16/25 (64.0)

 3. I trust the information and advice given in the intervention.

4.7 (0.5)

4-5

25/25 (100.0)

 4. The intervention was very well organized.

4.4 (0.7)

3-5

22/25 (88.0)

 5. Taking part in the intervention was worth my time and effort.

4.4 (0.7)

3-5

22/25 (88.0)

 6. Difficult topics and discussions were handled well.

4.3 (0.6)

3-5

23/25 (92.0)

 7. The intervention content was very relevant to me and my situation.

4.1 (0.8)

3-5

19/25 (76.0)

 8. Everyone had the chance to speak if they wanted to.

4.5 (0.8)

2-5

23/25 (92.0)

 9. The group worked very well together.

4.0 (0.9)

2-5

19/25 (76.0)

Additional items

 10. My expectations of the intervention were met.c

3.8 (0.8)

2-5

18/24 (75.0)

 11. The subject matter provided was clear and easy to understand.c

4.6 (0.5)

4-5

25/25 (100.0)

  1. Abbreviations: M Mean, SD Standard deviation
  2. arange on a Likert response scale from (0 strongly disagree - 5 strongly agree)
  3. bversus (strongly) disagree/disagree somewhat/agree somewhat
  4. cStudy specific items not included in the original heiQ-program