A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors and staff of BMC Palliative Care would like to publicly acknowledge our peer reviewers.
Reviewer acknowledgements
Annual Journal Metrics
-
Citation Impact 2023
Journal Impact Factor: 2.5
5-year Journal Impact Factor: 3.2
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.245
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.907
Speed 2023
Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 14
Submission to acceptance (median days): 187
Usage 2023
Downloads: 1,790,737
Altmetric mentions: 1,650
Peer Review Taxonomy
This journal is participating in a pilot of NISO/STM's Working Group on Peer Review Taxonomy, to identify and standardize definitions and terminology in peer review practices in order to make the peer review process for articles and journals more transparent. Further information on the pilot is available here.
The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
- Identity transparency: Single anonymized
- Reviewer interacts with: Editor
- Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication
We welcome your feedback on this Peer Review Taxonomy Pilot. Please can you take the time to complete this short survey.