Skip to main content
Download PDF

Correction to: An online international comparison of thresholds for triggering a negative response to the “Surprise Question”: a study protocol

BMC Palliative Care volume 19, Article number: 15 (2020) Cite this article

The Original Article was published on 09 April 2019

Correction to: BMC Palliat Care

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0413-x

Following publication of the original article [1], an error in reference 18 was reported.

Reference 18 did not include all authors. The correct reference should read: Romo RD, Lynn J. The utility and value of the “surprise question” for patients with serious illness. Can Med Assoc J. 2017;189(33):E1072–3.

Reference

  1. White N, Oostendorp L, Vickerstaff V, Gerlach C, Engels Y, Maessen M, Tomlinson C, Wens J, Leysen B, Biasco G, Zambrano S, Eychmüller S, Avgerinou C, Chattat R, Ottoboni G, Veldhoven C, Stone P. An online international comparison of thresholds for triggering a negative response to the “Surprise Question”: a study protocol. BMC Palliat Care. 2019;18:36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University College London, London, UK

    Nicola White, Linda Oostendorp, Victoria Vickerstaff, Christina Avgerinou & Patrick Stone

  2. University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany

    Christina Gerlach

  3. Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Yvonne Engels & Carel Veldhoven

  4. University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Maud Maessen, Sofia Zambrano & Steffen Eychmüller

  5. Imperial College London, London, UK

    Christopher Tomlinson

  6. University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

    Johan Wens & Bert Leysen

  7. University of Bologna & Academy of the Sciences of Palliative Medicine, Bologna, Italy

    Guido Biasco

  8. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Rabih Chattat & Giovanni Ottoboni

Authors
  1. Nicola White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda Oostendorp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victoria Vickerstaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christina Gerlach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yvonne Engels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maud Maessen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christopher Tomlinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Johan Wens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bert Leysen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Guido Biasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Sofia Zambrano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Steffen Eychmüller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Christina Avgerinou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Rabih Chattat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Giovanni Ottoboni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Carel Veldhoven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Patrick Stone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola White.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

White, N., Oostendorp, L., Vickerstaff, V. et al. Correction to: An online international comparison of thresholds for triggering a negative response to the “Surprise Question”: a study protocol. BMC Palliat Care 19, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0518-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0518-2

BMC Palliative Care

ISSN: 1472-684X

Contact us