Skip to main content

Psychosocial-spiritual interventions among Muslims undergoing treatment for cancer: an integrative review



Cancer is a global disease that affects all populations, including Muslims. Psychological and spiritual care of Muslim patients with cancer includes psychosocial and spiritual techniques that help to improve their mental health and spiritual well-being. Although these techniques are available to cancer patients worldwide, they are poorly studied among Muslim patients. This review aims to integrate the literature on the psychosocial-spiritual outcomes and perspectives of Muslim patients with cancer who have undergone psychotherapy.


We used the Whittemore and Knafl five-step methodology. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO using relevant keywords. Studies that focused on adult patients with cancer and on published evidence of using psychosocial and spiritual interventions among Muslim patients were included. Each study was reviewed, evaluated, and integrated.


A systematic search produced 18 studies that were thematically analyzed. Results showed different psychosocial and spiritual approaches currently used to care for Muslim patients with cancer that target mainly patients’ mental health, quality of life, and spiritual well-being. Four major themes emerged: (1) Treating Psychological Distress Without Psychopharmacologic Agents, (2) Improving Knowledge of Cancer for Improving QOL, (3) Depending on Faith for Spiritual Well-being, and (4) Relying on Religious and Spiritual Sources: Letting Go, Letting God.


The rigor of psychosocial and spiritual studies that target psychosocial-spiritual outcomes of Muslim cancer patients needs to be improved to reach conclusive evidence about their efficacy in this population.

Peer Review reports


Cancer is a growing health problem [1]. Up to 40% of patients diagnosed with cancer experience clinically significant levels of psychosocial-spiritual distress, often related to the profound life changes associated with a cancer diagnosis, the symptoms associated with the disease itself, and treatment side effects [2, 3]. Such distress can result in serious and far-reaching negative sequelae: poor quality of life, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and poor psychological well-being [4, 5]. The psychosocial-spiritual distress associated with cancer can be addressed using psychosocial and spiritual interventions such as dignity therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and meaning-centered psychotherapy [6]. These psychosocial and spiritual techniques can improve quality of life, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and spiritual well-being.

Cancer care requires attention to psychosocial-spiritual concerns to support patients’ successful adjustment [7]. However, lack of cultural and spiritual sensitivity in psycho-oncologic care can impact low-uptake among culturally and spiritually diverse groups [8]. Culturally and spiritually sensitive psycho-oncologic care embraces patients’ self-reported stories, beliefs, values, and practices shaped by historical and geopolitical contexts and religious and spiritual beliefs and practices [9]. However, few cancer-care specific psycho-oncologic interventions are specific to Muslim patients [10].

Islam is the second largest and fastest growing religion in the world. By 2050, Muslims will comprise almost 30% of the world’s population; it will be the world’s largest religious population [11]. In 2019, the global Muslim population was estimated at 1.9 billion. The ongoing growth of the Muslim population, and the increasing cancer prevalence among Muslims worldwide, warrant the need to gain insights into psycho-oncologic care, particularly psychosocial and spiritual approaches, used in the treatment of Muslims. The outcomes of psycho-oncologic approaches in patients with cancer have been widely studied and reviewed. Yet, these reviews have not examined such approaches as provided to Muslims. Given the predominance and ongoing growth of Islam, it is necessary to understand Muslims’ experiences with, and perceptions of, psycho-oncologic approaches, particularly with regard to their psychosocial-spiritual care. Thus, in addition to describing the effect of psychosocial and spiritual interventions on mental health, spiritual, and quality of life outcomes, a review is needed that integrates the literature on Muslim cancer patients’ experiences of these interventions.

The purpose of this review was to integrate the literature on the mental health, spiritual well-being, and quality of life outcomes with the perspectives of Muslims who have been treated with psychosocial and spiritual techniques to treat the psychosocial-spiritual distress associated with cancer or its treatment. We used the biopsychosocial-spiritual model as a framework for this review [12]. According to this model, illness can disrupt biological relationships that in turn disrupt the patients’ psychological, social, and spiritual relational aspects. Following the model, culturally and spiritually sensitive cancer care must address the totality of the patient’s relational existence—physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. In the model, spirituality is construed to have four domains: religiosity, religious coping and support, spiritual well-being, and spiritual need [12].



This integrative literature review used Whittemore and Knafl’s [13] methodology and the PRISMA criteria of quality for reporting reviews [14]. We used the narrative synthesis approach as it allows for the inclusion of studies with different research designs, including qualitative studies, thus providing a better understanding of the potential positive outcomes of using psycho-oncologic interventions from multiple lenses [13]. This synthesis provides extensive literature coverage and has the flexibility to deal with emerging knowledge and concepts.

Literature search

Table 1 presents the search terms and Boolean operators that were used to build the search strategy. This strategy was developed in consultation with a medical librarian. The search was conducted from September to November 2019 and updated in July 2020.

Table 1 Search Strategy

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Thus, studies were included if they used psychosocial-spiritual interventions, including those that appealed to religiosity and religious coping, as the primary intervention in cancer care; included Muslim participants with a diagnosis of any cancer; and were published in peer-reviewed journals between 2010 and 2020, in English. This timeframe reflects the last decade of international growth of psychosocial-spiritual interventions for Muslims living with cancer, all of which are the result of a systematic search process. We defined psychosocial-spiritual interventions as addressing mental health problems through systematic, time-limited activities, including those that involved complementary therapies, including those that appealed to religiosity and religious coping; that involved contacts between a cancer patient and a trained healthcare provider who sought to ameliorate cancer-related distress by producing changes in individuals’ feelings, thoughts, attitudes, and behavior; and that included a psychotherapeutic component, such as psychoeducation, therapeutic alliance, counseling, and structured, manualized interventions [15]. Studies were excluded if they were case reports or used observational methods, did not describe the applied psychosocial and spiritual technique/approach/intervention in the methods, and/or included psychopharmacologic agents as part of the intervention.


Two authors (AA and ML) independently screened titles and abstracts using the Covidence systematic review software (, to identify studies for full-text screening. These two authors then independently screened full-text studies to identify studies that fit inclusion criteria. At all stages, disagreements were resolved. The reference lists of the included studies were scanned for further studies.

Data evaluation

The included studies’ quality was assessed using two criteria, methodological or theoretical rigor and data relevance, on a 2-point scale (high = 1, low = 2). Methodological rigor was assessed according to whether the study’s methodology was explained in such detail that it could be replicated. Data relevance was assessed according to whether the data presented addressed the study’s stated aims. No studies were excluded on the basis of quality; however, more weight was given in analysis to studies with rigor and data relevance rates of 1.

Data extraction, analysis, and synthesis

Narrative synthesis accounted for differences in intervention approaches, study design, and methodological quality among the reviewed studies. Studies reporting similar outcomes were clustered and discussed together to draw meaningful interpretations of the data.

Interpretations regarding clinical relevance were made regardless of whether studies were statistically powered; however, we only described the intervention as useful for studies that used a 2-arm design. We only described the intervention as useful if the outcome measure between the study arms was reported as significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).

Extracted data were compared word-by-word in a data extraction table in Excel. We (AA and ML) created a list of keywords for each study. These keywords were reviewed to decide what concepts the data reflected. We used these concepts as codes. Each code was compared to all other codes. Comparisons for similarities, differences, and general patterns were made. Similar and reciprocal codes were categorized and grouped. These coded categories were compared and contrasted. The initial subgroup classification relied on psychosocial-spiritual outcomes, which were analyzed by evaluating all interventions and qualitative designs. We (AA and ML) organized these subgroups by themes based on commonality, relationships, and patterns and refined these themes to encompass as much of the data as possible. Presentations of primary source data were employed to simplify the distinctions between patterns, themes, and associations. We assembled the analogous variables next to one another to assess for any associations between them. The final stage involved a shift from interpretive efforts to descriptive ones that sought to determine patterns and relationships to understand higher abstraction levels.


The review methodology was submitted to PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) in August 2019, and was approved (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020159191; ID=CRD42020159191).


Search outcomes

The final sample included 18 articles for review (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram

Study characteristics and quality of the reviewed studies

The included studies in this review were published between 2013 and 2019. The 18 studies included a total of 2996 participants. Female participants outnumber male participants, and all participants’ ages were ≥ 18 years old. Fewer than 50% of the studies used two or more self-reported outcome measures. Table 2 describes the country where the study was conducted and the study’s design and analytic approach.

Table 2 Country of Origin and Research Designs of Included Studies

Table 3 shows the characteristics and findings of psychosocial-spiritual interventions by treatment approach. The cancer types and stages in the included studies were heterogeneous and ranged between the early and late cancer stages. However, several studies did not specify the site or stages of cancer of the participants. The most prevalent cancer type in the review sample is breast cancer. These studies were conducted in different cancer care settings, such as hospitals, cancer research centers, and oncology and radiotherapy departments.

Table 3 Characteristics and Findings of Psychotherapeutic Interventions by Treatment Approach

The psychosocial-spiritual interventions’ duration ranged from 3 to 12 weeks. The contents of the interventions and duration and length of sessions varied, but two had relatively similar content and protocol [18, 19]. A trained facilitator performed the interventions in some of the included studies (n = 5, 28%). Two studies [20, 21] used complementary therapy such as laughter yoga and aromatherapy. Three studies implemented psychoeducation, including education about the emotional and psychological aspects [22,23,24]. Six studies [25,26,27,28,29,30] used different strategies for cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Finally, seven studies [10, 18, 19, 31,32,33,34] relied on Islamic religious principles and practices as a part of a psychosocial-spiritual intervention among cancer patients that had a psychotherapeutic component to it. The included studies evaluated mental health outcomes using different scales, such as the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). The quality scores and comments on reviewed studies are presented in Table 3.


Four major themes emerged: (1) Treating Mental Health Without Psychopharmacologic Agents, (2) Improving Knowledge of Cancer for Improving QOL, (3) Depending on Faith for Spiritual Well-being, and (4) Relying on Religious and Spiritual Sources: Letting Go, Letting God.

Treating mental health without psychopharmacologic agents

Among the 18 studies, eight studies showed improvement in mental health outcomes [10, 20,21,22, 24, 27, 29, 34]. Specifically, psychoeducation [22] and CBT [27] improved depression and anxiety symptoms and stress. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy had a significant long-term effect (p = 0.014) on self-management, posttraumatic growth, and functional disability [29]. Aromatherapy [21] contributed to stress relief and improved sleep quality. Complementary therapy (laughter yoga) [20] and psychoeducation [22, 24] enhanced a sense of optimism and hopefulness.

Improving knowledge of Cancer for improving QOL

This theme was represented by seven studies that addressed the role of CBT [25, 26, 28, 30], spiritual therapy [34], and psychoeducation [23, 24] on enhancing quality of life in Muslim patients with cancer. Spiritual group therapy helped patients listen to their inner voice, let go of resentment, and forgive, which led to improvements in quality of life [18, 34]. Education about the psychological aspects of cancer and mindfulness-based stress reduction [30] assisted patients in enhancing cognitive, emotional, and social function [24]. Other participants showed improvement in overall quality of life and emotional well-being among psychoeducation groups [23]. Men with prostate cancer also indicated that CBT enhances their quality of life [26]. Finally, a combination of CBT and a spiritual-religious intervention was found to promote breast cancer survivors’ quality of life and coping responses [25].

Depending on faith for spiritual well-being

Five studies employed a spiritual therapeutic technique [18, 19, 32,33,34], all of which reported improved spiritual well-being. Patients who received spiritual psychoeducation and counseling, such as educational materials about Islam, relaxation exercises, and meditation, reported improved spiritual well-being scores [33]. Women with breast cancer, through spiritual therapy, discussed spiritual and religious beliefs (regarding death and fear of death, faith, and trust in God) and the effect of these beliefs on life [34]. In Jafari and colleagues’ [18] study, women with breast cancer explored negative and positive thoughts in a spiritually based therapy, which resulted in improved senses of meaning and peace.

Relying on religious and spiritual sources: letting go, letting god

Muslim patients with cancer relied on spiritual and religious sources while applying psychosocial-spiritual therapy to provide comfort, coping, and meaning in their experience, as described in three studies (spiritual counseling [19] & spiritual-religious interventions [23. 30]). Patients living with cancer considered their belief in God as a central source of their power [32]. This source supported their inner-strength, which was necessary to fight death anxiety. Patients adopted a strategy of accepting divine providence, which leads to improvements in the faith element of spiritual well-being. In the 2017 study by Ghahari and colleagues [25], breast cancer survivors used spiritual/religious resources to solve personal and interpersonal problems that enhanced their coping responses. Both were practicing prayer and religious advice, such as reciting verses from the Qur’an, which played a paramount role in alleviating patients’ suffering and promoting a sense of contentment and self-confidence [20].


The purpose of this integrative review was to synthesize the research on the psychosocial-spiritual outcomes of psychosocial-spiritual interventions in Muslim patients undergoing treatment for cancer. We used a narrative approach to research synthesis and sought to generate new insights and recommendations by going beyond the summary of findings from different studies [14]. The individual studies used various outcome measures, cancer types and stages, and intervention modalities in our review. This heterogeneity renders it challenging to conduct a systematic review due to clinical diversity (population, intervention, & outcomes), inconsistency in effect size and direction, and lack of data to calculate standardized effect sizes, hence the narrative design.

Psychosocial-spiritual interventions are nonpharmacological strategies that address psychosocial-spiritual distress associated with cancer [5]. Throughout this review, we noted a myriad of psychosocial-spiritual interventions studied in Muslim patients with cancer that target various psychosocial-spiritual outcomes, including promoting patients’ mental health, quality of life, and spiritual well-being [24, 25], which were the most common outcomes in the studies included for review. Reviewed studies have shown that CBT-based interventions are promising strategies to improve psychosocial-spiritual outcomes in Muslim patients with cancer [10, 18, 19, 31,32,33,34]. The reviewed studies are also informative in building a base for the effectiveness of psychosocial-spiritual interventions in Muslim patients’ psycho-oncologic treatment.

This review confirms the positive outcomes of various psychosocial-spiritual interventions on improving mental health, such as improving symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress [10, 20, 21, 24, 27, 29, 32, 34]. Consulting sessions [23, 25] provide patients with practical and educational information and resources related to emotions such as depression, anxiety, and fear associated with cancer. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy [27, 29] increases patients’ awareness of their feelings; throughout this therapy, patients acquire cognitive skills that promote metacognitive awareness, acceptance of negative thoughts, and an ability to effectively cope with psychological distress. Aromatherapy [21] entails using volatile essential oils of plants to enhance mental health. These oils stimulate the olfactory nerves, which connect to long-term memories that involve long-forgotten memories and their emotional links to one’s life. These emotions can enhance sleep quality and relieve stress. Laughter yoga [20] includes various techniques, such as clapping and chanting, and deep breathing, which prepare the mind for happiness and improve a sense of optimism and hopefulness.

This review also suggests that different psychosocial-spiritual interventions can enhance Muslim cancer patients’ quality of life. A diagnosis of cancer and its associated treatment leads to emotional distress because of deteriorating health and impending death, which can result in reduced quality of life. The hopelessness [18] that is associated with poor quality of life can also be a predictor of depressive symptoms among patients with cancer. Seven of the studies included in this review suggest that psychosocial-spiritual strategies can improve patients’ quality of life [23,24,25,26, 28, 30, 34].

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy [28] helps patients by incorporating cognitive therapy and meditative practices to attract attention to thoughts and feelings without prejudging consciously. This can help patients to improve mood and combat depressive symptoms such as hopelessness, and in turn, enhance quality of life. While yoga sessions [30] and psychoeducation [23] may stimulate brain pleasure centers, spiritual therapy [31] works on promoting illness perception through patients’ cultural beliefs and psychological needs. Zamaniyan and colleagues [34] indicate how spiritual therapy that includes education about the psychological aspects of patients undergoing chemotherapy contributes to improving symptoms of depression and anxiety, ultimately enhancing patients’ quality of life.

Some authors discussed the role of spiritual counseling and therapy [18, 19, 32,33,34] in improving spiritual well-being. These approaches help patients to increase self-awareness and broaden inner strengths and resources through addressing their spiritual questions, reciting Qur’an, and practicing relaxation exercises and meditation. Rassouli and colleagues [32] used these approaches to support patients coping with cancer and its related problems. Patients’ religious beliefs and some practices may conflict with therapists’ interpretations of patients’ experiences. Therefore, these spiritual counseling approaches may help patients with cancer to find meaning in the cancer experience and resolve these conflicts [19, 33]. Finally, Jafari and colleagues [18] demonstrate how a spiritual therapy intervention can help patients identify and shift negative thoughts and validate positive ones.

In three studies [19, 25, 32], the participants believed that God has the power to control their lives and circumstances and that God alone can cure the disease. These participants attributed their cancer to the will of God and admitted that they could not alter their own fates. These beliefs may help observant Muslims cope with negative feelings and experiences that may be associated with cancer. Patients acknowledged the significance of their absolute belief in God’s forgiveness and mercy as religious practices and spiritual resources and, while applying psycho-spiritual therapy, support the process of changing feelings of powerlessness into feelings of power.

There may be belief-hurdles for some Muslims. For example, they may feel that God has preordained all that happens in life, even cancer. Others may feel that, sometimes, suffering redeems for past sins. These belief-hurdles should be addressed in future studies, including how prevalent they are among Muslims, as they may be more culturally rather than theologically bounded.

Implications for research

The psychosocial-spiritual approaches in the included studies were not all described with the specificity necessary for replication. Psychosocial-spiritual approaches already established as efficacious in cancer patients need to be adapted to be culturally and spiritually sensitive to Muslims undergoing treatment for cancer and then tested to determine these adaptations’ benefits in this understudied population. And rigorous research designs, such as sufficiently powered randomized control trials with well-structured control groups, are necessary. Measuring the effects of extant efficacious psychosocial-spiritual interventions using a common set of standardized mental health, quality of life, and spiritual well-being outcome measures will facilitate comparing and synthesizing results of different studies across populations.

Our findings stress the need to conduct further randomized control trial (RCT) research with larger sample sizes of participants to determine the benefits and efficacy of culturally and spiritually sensitive psycho-oncologic interventions. RCT research would help to draw more definite conclusions about the efficiency of psycho-oncologic interventions. This will require standardized protocols for culturally and spiritually sensitive psycho-oncologic interventions, such as cancer type and stage included, uniform durations, and topics covered across the population. Cohort studies are also needed to evaluate the level of stability of these therapies’ long-term effects and improve the science of psycho-oncologic interventions. In conducting these studies, researchers should consider the representation of cancer patients from different socio-economic, cultural, and religious backgrounds to develop more sensitive adaptations of psychosocial-spiritual approaches to the care of Muslims living with cancer.

In addition, further qualitative studies are needed to explore the psychosocial-spiritual needs of cancer patients of different ages, cancer stages, and ethnicities. As well, none of the included studies reported cost or examine cost-effectiveness analysis, which is a crucial matter that should be considered in developing countries.

There is a paucity of studies conducted in the Middle East, the sub-continent of Asia, and the Asia-Pacific region, where most Muslims live. This lack may be due to conditions specific to, or a need to invest resources for rigorous RCT research in, these regions. While there are no religious restrictions on psychosocial-spiritual interventions (and indeed, in our experience the more devout a patient is the more inclined the patient is to accept psychosocial-spiritual interventions), clinicians and some patients may opt for a medical approach, due to quick onset of psychotropic medications’ effects, and that such medications are less costly than psychosocial-spiritual interventions. As well, there is pervasive doubt in the effectiveness of psychosocial-spiritual interventions. Testing interventions in rigorous RCTs may help to change this perception. There is also a paucity of studies conducted among Muslim cancer patients who live in Canada, Europe, the United Kingdom, and the United States. As Muslim populations grow in these areas, psychosocial-spiritual intervention studies in Muslims undergoing cancer treatment will be necessary for these regions.

Implication for practice

Patients and healthcare providers should work together to evaluate the psychosocial-spiritual distress associated with cancer and provide culturally and spiritually sensitive psycho-oncologic care. Since non-Muslim healthcare providers are not fully aware of how to offer culturally and spiritually sensitive cancer care to Muslims, this may result in misunderstandings of their religious beliefs and practices [17, 35]. Thus, culturally and spiritually sensitive psycho-oncologic interventions are likely to improve Muslim patients’ psychosocial-spiritual outcomes. Cultural and spiritual diversity is a variant that needs to be considered when teaching non-Muslim providers [16, 36]. Since psychosocial-spiritual approaches differ in their contents, durations, and goals, manuals of interventions adapted for, and tested in, Muslims would enable non-Muslim providers to deliver culturally and spiritually sensitive psycho-oncologic care.

Seeking medical help or disclosing psychosocial-spiritual distress because of mental illness stigma may be a matter of great concern among patients [35]. This stigma is not based on religious beliefs and practices, but rather on the stigma that a cancer diagnosis carries [37]. This stigma may interfere with seeking psycho-oncologic help to improve their mental health, quality of life, and spiritual well-being [38]. Culturally and spiritually sensitive interventions may help to reduce this stigma.

Overall, Muslims consider Islam a comprehensive way of life, and their faith plays a vital role in coping with adverse life events. Spirituality has a positive role in coping with loss and disease. As a consequence, non-Muslim cancer care providers need to be educated about culturally and spiritually sensitive psycho-oncologic interventions. Such providers need to learn about patients’ cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs and values (e.g., sincerity and selflessness), social norms (e.g., hospitality and generosity), and hierarchies, such as respect for the seniors, and gender differences. Future psycho-oncologic and palliative care practices require greater clarification regarding spiritual care competencies in an increasingly globalized world.

Limitations and strengths

Our findings should be considered in the context of their methodological shortcomings and potential limitations in generalizability. The scientific rigor of the studies included varies. The majority of reviewed studies recruited relatively small sample sizes, which resulted in being underpowered to detect the effects of these psychosocial and spiritual interventions. The experimental studies included in this review did not indicate whether intervention fidelity was applied in their protocol, and some lacked randomization, blindness techniques, and control groups. Most reviewed studies did not examine long-term effects, but rather focused on effects 3–12 weeks post-intervention. Only one study examined intervention effects at 10 weeks [31], and two studies at 12 weeks [26, 34]. The included studies used various controls, outcome measures, and intervention modalities, which rendered synthesis across studies challenging. This diversity makes it difficult to draw conclusions about any specific modality for a particular cancer stage or type. Our review highlights the importance of future studies sufficiently powered and with long-termfollow-up. We used the procedure of both authors coming consensus regarding disagreements in code development and data analysis [39]; however, code development and data analysis could have been strengthened by using a third researcher to settle disagreements.

Several studies included participants with a range of cancer types and stages simultaneously, instead of focusing on a specific type, stage, or treatment phase. This is a challenge in conducting cancer studies, except at major academic cancer centers where it is possible to conduct studies in patients of only a specific cancer type, stage, or treatment phase. Some studies included in this review did not specify the cancer stage or treatment phase, nor did they specify what the control group participants received. These limitations can act as threats to these studies’ validity or mask the real effect of the interventions implemented. Thus, in addition to well-powered studies with long-termfollow-up, future studies in homogenous populations are needed.


The reviewed studies provide an overview of the current state of research on psychosocial-spiritual interventions used to address psychosocial-spiritual distress associated with cancer in Muslim cancer patients. It complements previous reviews that did not include Muslims, which are soon to be nearly 30% of the world’s population [12]. Our results indicate the need for increased capacity to address Muslim patients’ psychosocial-spiritual needs living with cancer. Considering the rigor of the studies involved, in addition to their limitations, the evidence discussed here supports future studies to build an evidence base for clinical practice. Incorporating psychosocial-spiritual counseling and therapy into routine cancer care can promote the mental health, quality of life, and spiritual well-being of Muslims undergoing treatment for cancer. Researchers need to further examine the psychosocial-spiritual outcomes of established psycho-oncologic treatment modalities adapted to Muslims. Manualized interventions can help non-Muslim providers deliver culturally and spiritually sensitive cultural psycho-oncologic cancer care to Muslim patients.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.



Abdallah Abu Khait


Mark Lazenby


Cognitive Behavioral Therapy


Quality of Life


  1. 1.

    Hanna T, Kangolle A. Cancer control in developing countries: using health data and health services research to measure and improve access, quality and efficiency. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010;10(1).

  2. 2.

    Carlson L, Waller A, Mitchell A. Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with Cancer: review and recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(11):1160–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Salmon P, Clark L, McGrath E, Fisher P. Screening for psychological distress in cancer: renewing the research agenda. Psycho Oncol. 2014;24(3):262–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Akechi T. Psychotherapy for depression among patients with advanced Cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42(12):1113–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    de la Torre-Luque A, Gambara H, López E, Cruzado J. Psychological treatments to improve quality of life in cancer contexts: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016;16(2):211–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dose A, McCabe P, Krecke C, Sloan J. Outcomes of a dignity therapy/life plan intervention for patients with advanced Cancer undergoing chemotherapy. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2018;20(4):400–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Aten J. Spiritually oriented interventions for counseling and psychotherapy. Washington, DC: Am Psychol Assoc; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bloomer M, Al-Mutair A. Ensuring cultural sensitivity for Muslim patients in the Australian ICU: considerations for care. Aust Crit Care. 2013;26(4):193–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fang M, Sixsmith J, Sinclair S, Horst G. A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1).

  10. 10.

    Eilami O, Moslemirad M, Naimi E, Babuei A, Rezaei K. The effect of religious psychotherapy emphasizing the importance of prayers on mental health and pain in Cancer patients. J Relig Health. 2018;58(2):444–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pew Research Center. Muslims and Islam: Key findings in the U.S. and around the world. Pew Research Center. 2020; [cited 22 August 2020]. Available from:\.

  12. 12.

    Sulmasy D. A Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model for the Care of Patients at the End of Life. Gerontologist. 2002;42(suppl_3):24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Reprint—preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther. 2009;89(9):873–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    American Psychological Association. Understanding psychotherapy and how it works. 2020. [cited 21 August 2020]. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    World Health Organization. Stigma and discrimination [Internet]. 2020 [cited 22 August 2020]. Available from:

  17. 17.

    Kvillemo P, Bränström R. Experiences of a mindfulness-based stress-reduction intervention among patients with Cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(1):24–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jafari N, Farajzadegan Z, Zamani A, Bahrami F, Emami H, Loghmani A, et al. Spiritual therapy to improve the spiritual well-being of Iranian women with breast Cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Memaryan N, Ghaempanah Z, Saeedi MM, Aryankhesal A, Ansarinejad N, Seddigh R. Content of spiritual counselling for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in Iran: a qualitative content analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(7):1791–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nia M, Mohajer S, Ghahramanzadeh M, Mazlom S. Effect of laughter yoga on mental well-being of Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Evid Based Care J. 2019;9(3):7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ozkaraman A, Dügüm Ö, Özen Yılmaz H, Usta YÖ. Aromatherapy: the effect of lavender on anxiety and sleep quality in patients treated with chemotherapy. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2018;22(2):203–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mohd-Sidik S, Akhtari-Zavare M, Periasamy U, Rampal L, Fadhilah S, Mahmud R. Effectiveness of chemotherapy counselling on self-esteem and psychological affects among cancer patients in Malaysia: randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(5):862–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sajjad S, Ali A, Gul R, Mateen A, Rozi S. The effect of individualized patient education, along with emotional support, on the quality of life of breast cancer patients - a pilot study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;21:75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Periasamy U, Mohd Sidik S, Rampal L, Fadhilah S, Akhtari-Zavare M, Mahmud R. Effect of chemotherapy counseling by pharmacists on quality of life and psychological outcomes of oncology patients in Malaysia: a randomized control trial. Health Qual Life Outcome. 2017;15(1).

  25. 25.

    Ghahari S, Fallah R, Rad M, Farrokhi N, Bolhari J, Mousavi M, et al. Effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy and spiritual-religious intervention on improving coping responses and quality of life among women with breast cancer in Tehran. Bali Med J. 2017;6(2):409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Huri M, Huri E, Kayihan H, Altuntas O. Effects of occupational therapy on quality of life of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. A randomized controlled study. Saudi Medical Journal. 2015;36(8):954–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Haji Seyed Javadi T, Tajikzadeh F, Bayat H, Eshraghi N, Roshandel Z, Rahmani S. Comparison of effectiveness of the mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and the metacognition treatment on anxiety, depression and stress among breast cancer patients. Int Clin Neurosci j. 2018;5(2):62–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lotfi-Kashani F, Fallahi L, Akbari M, Mansour-Moshtaghi N, Abdollahi F. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on hopelessness among women with breast Cancer and gynecological Cancer. Int J Body Mind Culture. 2014;5(1):24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Norouzi H, Rahimian-Boogar I. Talepasand. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on posttraumatic growth, self-management and functional disability among patients with breast cancer. Nurs Pract Today. 2017;4(4):190–202.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Rahmani S, Talepasand S. The effect of group mindfulness - based stress reduction program and conscious yoga on the fatigue severity and global and specific life quality in women with breast cancer. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015;29(175):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Davari S, Rahimian Boogar I, Talepasand S, Evazi M. Effect of spiritual-religious intervention on illness perception in women with breast Cancer. Health Spirituality Med Ethics. 2018;5(4):28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rassouli M, Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar A. Experiences of patients with cancer and their nurses on the conditions of spiritual care and spiritual interventions in oncology units. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015;20(1):25–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sajadi M, Niazi N, Khosravi S, Yaghobi A, Rezaei M, Koenig H. Effect of spiritual counseling on spiritual well-being in Iranian women with cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;30:79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zamaniyan S, Bolhari J, Naziri G, Akrami M, Hosseini S. Effectiveness of spiritual group therapy on quality of life and spiritual well-being among patients with breast Cancer. Iran J Med Sci. 2016;41(2):140–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gustafson C, Lazenby M. Assessing the unique experiences and needs of Muslim oncology patients receiving palliative and end-of-life care: an integrative review. J Palliat Care. 2018;34(1):52–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Richards P, Bergin A. A spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy. 2nd ed. Washington; 2005.

  37. 37.

    Huang Z, Yu T, Wu S, Hu A. Correlates of stigma for patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2020;29(3):1195–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kim W, Bae J, Lim J, Lee M, Hahm B, Yi H. Relationship between physicians' perceived stigma toward depression and physician referral to psycho-oncology services on an oncology/hematology ward; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic Analysis. Int J Qual Method. 2017;16(1):160940691773384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to express their gratitude to Valori Banfi (a Reference and Medical Librarian) for help in the search process.


This research is a part of the grant for Developing a Palliative Care Intervention for Muslims, American Cancer Society. # MRSG-15-053-01, Lazenby, M. (PI). This funder had no role in the design, the data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, writing of the manuscript, or any other part of the study.

Author information




ML conceptualized the study. AA and ML analyzed and synthesized the data. ML and AA were involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data from the included studies. AA and ML screened the citations, reference list, and full-text articles. All authors extracted data and critically evaluated the quality of the included studies. They created tables and figures and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdallah Abu Khait.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abu Khait, A., Lazenby, M. Psychosocial-spiritual interventions among Muslims undergoing treatment for cancer: an integrative review. BMC Palliat Care 20, 51 (2021).

Download citation


  • Psychotherapy
  • Muslim patients
  • Cancer
  • Psychosocial-spiritual outcomes